Re: reiser4 patches and todo list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[...]
On 01/08/2012 04:43 PM, Daniel Horne wrote:


        Your patch for 2.6.39-1 seems to compile fine on 3.0, but not on
        3.1 or
        3.2. The problem seems to be that the patch re-adds the
        PF_FLUSHER flag
        to the sched.h, as it relies on it, but on 3.1 and on that
        flag's value
        is used for the PF_NPROC_EXCEEDED flag.

        I'd be tempted to to swap the PF_FLUSHER check for PF_SWAPWRITE,
        as all
        kthreads that set PF_FLUSHER also set PF_SWAPWRITE, but there'd
        be some
        false-positives there and I'm not sure what effect this would have.


    Hello Daniel,

    I don't see any PF_FLUSHER flag in vanilla 3.2, so it shouldn't
    be an issue.

    There is one more problem with 3.X. I have described it here:
    http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-__devel&m=132603099732236&w=2
    <http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=132603099732236&w=2>

    Thanks,
    Edward.



There isn't a PF_FLUSHER, but the value it used to have is now defined
as PF_NPROC_EXCEEDED.

Ah, you are right.

I suppose we could define PF_FLUSHER to be 0x00080000, as that doesn't
seem to be taken.

Yes, that's the way.
We need to make sure that task is a flusher, so I think using
PF_SWAPWRITE for this purpose is not a good idea..

Thanks!
Edward.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux