Re: [fsck.reiser4 --fix] segfaults and reports that it fixed problem (but it doesn't)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



zic422@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Check was perfomed from Debian Squeeze.
> Even if I explicitly write -o
> create=ccreg40,compress=lzo1,cluster=4K

Why do you need so small clusters?
Frankly, I don't know any patten, where
things with 4K clusters go better...

> ,compressMode=ultim the only
> difference is that there is no segfault.
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux