Hi Frederic, On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:56:34 +0200 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Note that the kill-the-bkl/reiserfs tree has suffered from too much > lock inversion problems lately. Even though I just fixed the last one > reported, I would feel more comfortable to schedule this tree for .33 > rather than .32 > > So this tree can be removed from -next and reintegrated once -rc1 is > released, without problem. OK, I have removed it from today. Please let me know when it should be readded (in case I forget - which at my age is likely :-)). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpiOpdJpSBqt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
