Re: [ANNOUNCE] Reiserfs/kill-bkl tree v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Definitely, the cost of the rare bug is much higher.  The good 
> news is that reiserfs tends to pile its races into a few spots.  
> Most of them can be found with a 12 hour run of the namesys 
> stress.sh program and a lot of memory pressure.  I'd compile with 
> preemption on and you'll have a good test on any SMP machine.
> 
> http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/stress.sh
> 
> stress.sh just copies a source directory into the test filesystem, 
> then reads it back and deletes it in a loop.  I'd run with 50 
> procs and enough memory pressure for the box to lightly swap 
> (booting w/mem= is a fine way to make memory pressure).  This way 
> you make sure to hammer on the metadata writeback paths, which is 
> where all of the difficult races come in.
> 
> Testing with an fsx-linux process running at the same time will 
> make sure all of the mmap/truncate paths are working correctly as 
> well.

Ok, that definitely looks like something feasible to run for 
Frederic too, thanks for the detailed suggestion!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux