Hi Al, Stephen,
This patchset is subsequent to a rebase of the bkl killing in reiserfs
work rebased against -rc6. It contains only fixes.
The old topic is left unchanged but the new one reiserfs/kill-bkl-rc6 can
be pulled against -rc6 without problem.
Also, Al, I don't know if you would still accept to apply this work in the VFS
tree.
The fact is that it becomes late in the process, we are already in -rc6
and I would like it to be tested at least in linux-next.
So, it's up to you. Whether you prefer to apply it and make it
available to next, or I can ask Stephen to pull directly from my tree.
Thanks,
Frederic.
The following changes since commit b693ba70c541a5a26eb4e8f2db5ade454afe1c74:
Frederic Weisbecker (1):
kill-the-bkl/reiserfs: unlock only when needed in search_by_key
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git
reiserfs/kill-bkl-rc6
Frederic Weisbecker (2):
kill-the-bkl/reiserfs: acquire the inode mutex safely
kill-the-bkl/reiserfs: move the concurrent tree accesses checks per superblock
fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c | 17 +++++------------
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c | 5 +----
fs/reiserfs/journal.c | 34 ----------------------------------
fs/reiserfs/prints.c | 4 ----
fs/reiserfs/stree.c | 5 +----
fs/reiserfs/xattr.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h | 11 +++++++++++
8 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
