Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill-the-BKL/reiserfs3: performance improvements, faster than Bkl based scheme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The BKL is clearly removed at a faster reate with such debugging 
> measures in place. With such measures the BKL _really_ hurts, and 
> very visibly so - and that results in active removal.

Btw., if you can think of any way to create a cleaner debug tool 
here i'd be glad to start a new tree that adds only _that_ tool - 
and that could perhaps be dealt with independently and possibly 
pulled upstream too, if clean enough.

The problem is, i think it would still quack like a global mutex, 
would walk like a global mutex and would look like a global mutex
:-/

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux