Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Reiserfs doesn't use lock_super anywhere internally, and ->remount_fs
which calls reiserfs_resize does have it currently but also expects it
to be held on return, so there's no business for the unlock_super here.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Acked by Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@xxxxxxxxx>
Index: linux-2.6/fs/reiserfs/resize.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/reiserfs/resize.c 2009-04-23 21:23:25.631074621 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/fs/reiserfs/resize.c 2009-04-23 21:23:29.435949732 +0200
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *
if (reiserfs_allocate_list_bitmaps(s, jbitmap, bmap_nr_new) < 0) {
printk
("reiserfs_resize: unable to allocate memory for journal bitmaps\n");
- unlock_super(s);
return -ENOMEM;
}
/* the new journal bitmaps are zero filled, now we copy in the bitmap
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
