Dear Arend;
You wrote
Christian Stroetmann OntoLab wrote:
Dear Christian;
You wrote:
Guys,
I did NOT intend to start (yet another) /flamewar/ about the pros and
cons of this filesystem. I was really only wondering about the
showstoppers left (i.e. code to fix) before this could be included. I
still imagine that having a (halfway current) TODO list of things
would help a lot here. The KernelJanitors/Todo list looks like a sane
example of what I meant to have.
Bashing around about "renaming the filesystem" and "unfriendly
developers" is not what I consider helpful on this particular matter.
Thanks,
Christian.
It seems to be, that we're running in circles since 2 or 3 years.
A complaint about running around in circles is not a showstopper that
blocks inclusion. Renaming "Reiser4" to "OntoFs" doesn't help either. A
good Todo list would really be helpful to keep track of the status, to
trigger feature implementation and/or bug fixes, and to have discussions
about content, not procedures.
Regards,
Arend
I would like to encourage everybody interested in this subject to first
read the reiserfs-devel mailing-list and my website concerning the R4
filesystem entirely and carefully. If it is helpful and still not clear
what is going on, I'm also willing to write a list of the steps that
have happened.
Sincerely
Christian *<:o)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
