geearf@xxxxxxx wrote: > Hello people, > Hello. > after running into big disk IO I investigated a bit and found that my / is a bit fragmented (the tree is at about 9% from measurefs). > measurefs.reiser4 is pretty ancient, and I guess that it works incorrectly for compressed files. > Can that affect a ccreg40 filesystem badly? Anything else relative to R4 that I can look into? > (External) fragmentation resulted in a number of "extents" is a sticky thing inherent to all linux file systems, including reiser4. Currently there is no tools to reorganize reiser4 without having a spare partition. However, it is possible to create something simple like xfs_fsr: it would be an appreciable help. The "smart reiser4 repacker" based on the flush algorithm was supposed to be the paid option, and therefore there are some obvious issues of its development. Internal fragmentation, resulted in wasteful space utilization ("holes" in the metadata blocks") would mean a bug in the code. This fragmentation can be measured as 1 minus the fraction du (1) / df (1). Note, that du (1) should be applied to the semantic root. If you have ccreg40 partition, then check it with "fsck.reiser4 --fix" prior using du (1). Also make sure (for example with sync (1)) that there is no dirty pages prior using df (1). If the internal fragmentation is more then 0.02, while du (1) is large enough (> 100 000), then, please, report. Thanks, Edward. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html