[H. Peter Anvin - Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:49:14AM -0800] | Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: | >> | >> Hi Jaswinder, | >> | >> it seems we have a clash here :) I thought this part | >> was just dropped out | >> | >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/461 | >> | >> and Peter had been applying it on tip:x86/header-fixes | >> | >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/549 | >> | >> but maybe it's just lost... | > | > No, you cannot remove sys_arch_prctl otherwise you will get sparse | > warning like this: | > | > CHECK arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:833:6: warning: symbol 'sys_arch_prctl' was not declared. Should it be static? | > | | Perhaps we can just move this prototype to <asm/syscalls.h>. | | -hpa | | -- | H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center | I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. | Hmm... For internal use we refer to do_arch_prctl and sys_arch_prctl supposed to be syscall wrapper. Yes, Peter, you're right! It seems this call was missed there. -Cyrill- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
