Jaroslav Fojtik wrote: > Dear Edward, > > >>> I do not know why these block sizes has been disabled - stability? speed? >>> Overflowing block count? >>> >>> >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9108 >> >> Reiserfs has never worked properly with small blocksizes, and it was >> unpleasant surprise when I saw that it is enabled again in >> reiserfsprogs-3.6.19. >> > > >> IMHO there is no chances to make reiserfs work with 512K blocks. >> > Never mind. > > >> Other cases should be carefully debugged. Put in longterm todo. >> > OK. > > And make it sense for you to make a test on my HDD with blocksize 1024 > "HDD with blocksize" is a poor phrase. HDD has a property "sector size". Blocksize is a property of filesystem. > and report you a problem? At least one known crash could be avoided. > No, it doesn't, if you mean to reproduce a crash with reiserfs formatted by "mkreiserfs -b 1024": I know how to reproduce it. Thanks. Edward. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
