Re: [PATCH 0/20] return f_fsid for statfs(2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 20, 2009  12:30 +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> Ext[234] is sophisticated to have on-disk uuid record. Most file systems
> in the patches (except jfs and reiser3) do not have a persistent uuid,
> a reasonable/feasible solution without media format modification is fsid
> in boot/mount life cycle. That's why huge_encode_dev(sb->s_bdev->bd_dev)
> is used here.  For jfs and reiserfs3, is there any use case for
> persistent fsid cross boots ?

I would say yes, this is worthwhile to do, or the fsid can change between
boots unnecessarily.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux