On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Ralph Ulrich <eulenreich@xxxxxx> wrote: > You didn' answer my main question: >>> Is it true that the programming style of reiser4 is recursive style and The code is open, and you're welcome to read it. I wouldn't call recursion a "style" so much as an approach to solving a particular problem. I think of "style" being things like whether your curly braces go on the same line or on the next line, how much whitespace you allow between code elements, etc. Perhaps you're just saying that because English isn't your primary language? >>> that this kind of style was rejected from the kernel developers? Which rejection? And who are "kernel developers"? The code is in Andrew Morton's tree, and I think "kernel developers" would agree that Andrew Morton is a kernel developer. If your actual question is "how come reiser4 is not in mainline?" This question has been asked and answered repeatedly. In fact, try typing "reiser4 mainline" into google and read the results. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
