[PATCH 1/3][reiser4] use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up() when possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This was item #6 on the todo list for reiser4 inclusion in mainline:

diff --git a/fs/reiser4/entd.c b/fs/reiser4/entd.c
index ecdfde6..9fd4d6e 100644
--- a/fs/reiser4/entd.c
+++ b/fs/reiser4/entd.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void reiser4_leave_flush(struct super_block *super)
 #endif
 	spin_unlock(&ent->guard);
 	if (wake_up_ent)
-		wake_up(&ent->wait);
+		wake_up_process(ent->tsk);
 }

 #define ENTD_CAPTURE_APAGE_BURST SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ int write_page_by_ent(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 	ent->nr_todo_reqs++;
 	list_add_tail(&rq.link, &ent->todo_list);
 	if (ent->nr_todo_reqs == 1)
-		wake_up(&ent->wait);
+		wake_up_process(ent->tsk);

 	spin_unlock(&ent->guard);


-Ryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux