Hello As I saw while doing this that there are only about 1200 errors left I was stubborn enough to continue cleaning. So here's the newest patch, probably last one, which shaves off another ~1000 errors reported by checkpatch. It's the 3'rd in series, so it's based on 2.6.27-rc1-mm1+newcleanups+newcleanups1. It's compile tested ofcourse and compressed because it's ~275kB. I hope this helped Have fun Dushan On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dushan Tcholich wrote: >> Hi >> Have these mails passed to m-l? > > Yes. > Thanks! > >> I can't see these mails in archives, >> but I haven't recieved the rejected mail notifications too. >> Mail me if you need patches sent some other way. >> >> Thanks >> Dushan >> >> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Dushan Tcholich <dusanc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> I've made more cleanups ontop of the patch from yesterday. >>> This new patch removes around 1200 errors and 40 warnings reported by >>> checkpatch-0.21 >>> Errors removed are: ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" >>> Warnings removed are from extra spaces around parenthesis. >>> Patch was compile tested against 2.6.27-rc1-mm1+newcodecleanups.patch >>> >>> I hope this helps >>> >>> Have a nice day >>> Dushan >>> >>> PS. patch is about 400kB so i had to compress it >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Dushan Tcholich <dusanc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> While running checkpatch on newest r4 in -mm kernels I noticed that I >>>> already did some cleanups that were reported. >>>> Then I realised that one patch that I sent that removed about >>>> 300errors and 500 warnings was misplaced in that patchstorm :) and not >>>> sent to akpm. >>>> Here it is again rebased on 2.6.27-rc1-mm1, compile tested. >>>> Please review >>>> >>>> Thanks for your time >>>> Dushan >>>> >>>> >> >> > >
Attachment:
newcodecleanups2.patch.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data