Re: request for patches: showing mount options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>   all - fs has options, but doesn't define ->show_options()
>   some - fs defines ->show_options(), but some options are not shown
>   noopt - fs does not have options
>   good - fs shows all options
>   patch - I have a patch

[...]

> > autofs      all
> 
> I'm not sure I understand this.
> How does autofs show it's options without a ->show_options method?

It doesn't.  The "all" means, all of them need to be added to
->show_options(), not that all are shown.

I can see now that this is slightly confusing, sorry.

So the ones that need attention are "all" and "some".  The others are
fine in theory.  Of course I may have missed something.

> > autofs4     some
> 
> OK, uid and gid aren't shown.
> That should be straight forward to fix.
> What's your time frame for this?

ASAP ;)

2.6.24 would be a nice, but it won't be easy...

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux