Re: fsck - and there was much rejoicing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pardon my ignorance, but can you detail the bug a little more, or link to a
bug report? I'm unafamiliar :)

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:01 PM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning,
> and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of
> files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at
> reasonable speed.
>
> Thanks to the folks who got this one. I *really* needed to do this, esp.
> to our backup drives.
>
>        mark
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux