Re: /etc/redhat-release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:14 PM,  <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> <snip>
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Stainforth, Matthew (SD/DS)
>> <Matthew.Stainforth@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> The "pain point" I mentioned was the inconsistent treatment of
>>>> /etc/redhat-release which causes maintenance work for those of us who
>>>> do need to parse it in scripts over time. We can expect distinct
>>>> cases for each major release of RHEL but there have also been
>>>> occasions where this file has changed in unpredictable ways across
>>>> minor update levels as well.
> <snip>
> Y'know, when all you want is lsb_release, and I know I'd noticed it when I
> installed it on some of our servers, but this finally penetrated, so I
> just did rpm -qi -R redhat-lsb. Can *ANYONE* explain to me why it needs
> libX11? I mean, it's a bloody command line shell script that prints to
> STDOUT!

Having the redhat-lsb package installed is *supposed* to mean your
system is LSB compliant. That entails a lot more than that one shell
script.

John

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux