Rob Marti wrote: > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of cliff here > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 9:13 AM > > I agree, I think he's trying to expand the file in a partition that is > full > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > No problem with the file: >> > >> > [root@ELOS-BD in]# unzip -t Master032010.zip >> > Archive: Master032010.zip >> > testing: SongMaster201003.txt OK >> > No errors detected in compressed data of Master032010.zip. >> > >> > I'm connected as root. >> > >> > But, you are right, it seems that changing the permissions to 777 it >> > unzips ok. >> <snip> >> This bothers me. I haven't been following this thread, but does it unzip >> with 666, rather than 777? A zip file does not need be executable. >> > How would changing the permissions matter if he's trying to expand into a > full partition? Hint - it wouldn't. I said I hadn't followed the thread, so I didn't see if he posted his df. I was just uncomfortable with someone's suggestion of making it a 777, and so world-executable. mark -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
