Re: Protecting the bindpw in /etc/ldap.conf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Good point. I'll probably go for this option.


Kenneth

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Marti, Robert <RJM002@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Even if LDAP is the requirement - /etc/ldap.conf doesn't have to be world
> readable, does it?
>
> Rob Marti
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stainforth, Matthew (SD/DS)
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 7:58 AM
> To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Protecting the bindpw in /etc/ldap.conf
>
> > We're about to set up our RHEL servers to authenticate againts Active
> > Directory (AD) 2008. I'd like to protect the binding user password
> > (i.e.
> > bindpw) so that regulars users can't get hold of it. Are others doing
> > this
> > too, or does one not consider this as a security issue? If protecting
> > it,
> > how to you set up this?
>
> Kerberos is what I use instead of LDAP and it doesn't require a password,
> at least in my environment.
>
> Matt
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux