If you are going to have to mount it manually on the passive node when a failure occurs, then why even worry about clustering? Why not just have an ext3 volume on some shared storage? You won't have to worry about locking and/or LWW because only one machine will have it mounted at a time. (This does sound like it needs to be a full blown RHCS deployment to provide any realistic HA, but this ext3 and manual fail over should "work") -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
