Sorry, I thought you were the original poster. Concerning legal advice--only lawyers and a limited others in the legal profession are able to despise legal advice. Red Hat administrators do not meet the legal definition of "lawyer". If this causes a problem, the problem is with the laws that restrict legal advice to the legal community. You have never had the Oracle or Microsoft sales department lie to you? Your experience is different from what we have experienced with Oracle or Microsoft. On the other hand, we have had good experiences with the Red Hat sales department. We haven't found "hidden" statements that caused us heartburn. From our experience, if one thinks that the Red Hat sales department will not give good information, you will be delighted to find otherwise. Again, sorry to mis-identify you as the original poster. On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Stainforth, Matthew (SD/DS) < Matthew.Stainforth@xxxxxx> wrote: > > your company should have a lawyer/attorney. > > your company attorney should be the one offering you, as an employee, > > the > > meaning of the contracts NOT a red hat mailing list. > > > > your use of the word "legal" also shows a lack of understanding of the > > issues involved. > > You're confusing me with the OP, but that's ok. Unless you're the list > maintainer or a Red Hat staffer, you still don't speak for what is and is > not appropriate for this list. > > > you made the assumption that the red hat sales department will treat > > you > > like oracle, microsoft, or other companies. > > I don't even know what that's supposed to mean. > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
