Re: redhat-list Digest, Vol 63, Issue 15

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    PLEASE STOP EMAILING ME IM IN HIGH SCHOOL YOU HAVE THE
WRONG LAUREN  MCMILLAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

----- Original Message Follows -----
From: redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: redhat-list Digest, Vol 63, Issue 15
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 12:00:33 -0400 (EDT)


>Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to
>      redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>      https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
>to
>      redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>    redhat-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
>specific than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1. iSCSI/iSAS (M. Hamzah Khan)
>   2. lvm (Joy Methew)
>   3. RE: Problem with selinux? (Geofrey Rainey)
>   4. Re: lvm (Edson Marquezani Filho)
>   5. Re: lvm (mark)
>   6. Re: lvm (navneet sharma)
>   7. Re: lvm (mark)
>   8. horde (Joy Methew)
>     9. Re: horde (Harry Hoffman)
>  10. Re: horde (Barry Brimer)
>  11. RE: Prefix question (Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS -
>UniCredit Group))
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>-----------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:01:25 +0100
>From: "M. Hamzah Khan" 
>Subject: iSCSI/iSAS
>To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>Message-ID: <4A084BD5.2080107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hello everyone,
>
>I'm trying to setup an iSCSI target (stgt) with an iSAS
>server (Open-iSAS).
>
>I read README.redhat.setup, and now I am a little confused.
>
>The README file provided by RedHat states that to setup
>stgt with Open-iSAS, I must edit isasadm.conf, and
>set SourceName to the target name for the iSCSI tgt target.
>
>The problem is that I have multiple targets defined in
>/etc/tgt/targets.conf.
>
>Which target must I set the SourceName to?
>
>I understand that the actual registration is done using
>isnsadm - --register, so I can run the command multiple
>times, each time with a different target.
>
>Does this mean I do not need to edit isasadm.conf?
>
>Regards
>
>Hamzah
>
>- --
>M. Hamzah Khan
>RedHat Certified Engineer Number: 804005539516829
>Email: hamzah[at]hamzahkhan.com
>URL: http://www.hamzahkhan.com
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
>http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>iEYEARECAAYFAkoIS9UACgkQdfTMIiHVzMmlggCgoTJh5Tj+ILDhgdGdsNC
>mrNs0 HOAAoIjKoKN0VjgNsNf3lsqmBnNjz/ms
>Ã
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:08:54 -0400
>From: Joy Methew 
>Subject: lvm
>To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Message-ID:
>   
><64fd0700905111108m6c947ae2k3cc8181e38b0651b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset>
>hello all,
>                   when we wanna create LVM we create a lvm
>type drive with 8e code.
>but here we can can create lvm partation with simple linux
>partation with code 83.
>so here is no need to create 8e code partation....
>any perticular reaseon behind this?
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:10:22 +1200
>From: "Geofrey Rainey" 
>Subject: RE: Problem with selinux?
>To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list"
> Message-ID:
>   
>,
>and le -lZ , and reply with the output.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>Esteban Torres Rodriguez Sent: Monday, 11 May 2009 11:18
>p.m. To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
>Subject: Problem with selinux?
>
>Hello Everybody!!!
>
>I have thats problem with machine on Redhat 4, with
>samba-3.0.25b-1.el4_6.5 and winbind.
>
>*May 11 10:24:16 smb04 kernel: audit(1242030246.549:8):
>avc:  denied  { write } for  pidb32 comm>name>scontext>tcontext>
>May 11 10:24:16 smb04 kernel: audit(1242030246.899:9): avc:
> denied  { getattr } for  pidb51 comm>name>scontext>tcontext>
>May 11 10:24:16 smb04 kernel: audit(1242030246.899:10):
>avc:  denied  { read write } for  pidb51 comm>name>scontext>tcontext>
>May 11 10:24:16 smb04 kernel: audit(1242030246.899:11):
>avc:  denied  { lock } for  pidb51 comm>name>scontext>tcontext>
>May 11 10:24:16 smb04 kernel: audit(1242030255.492:12):
>avc:  denied  { lock } for  pidb51 comm>name>scontext>tcontext>
>I disabled selinux.Anyone help me?
>
>-- 
>##################################################
># Esteban Torres Rodríguez                       #
># Área de Soporte Técnico                        #
># Subdirección de Sistemas Informáticos          # 
># Empresa Pública Desarrollo Agrario y Pesquero  #
># email: etorres@xxxxxx                          #
>##################################################
>
>
>-- 
>redhat-list mailing list
>unsubscribe
>mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>>r more information on the Television New Zealand Group,
>visit us online at tvnz.co.nz 
>>UTION:  This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain
>information that is intended to be read only by the named
>recipient(s).  This information is not to be used or stored
>by any other person and/or organisation.
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:20:24 -0300
>From: Edson Marquezani Filho 
>Subject: Re: lvm
>To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Message-ID:
>   
><2fc5f090905111820t66156f0ctfd476e02ae3b295@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset>
>On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Joy Methew
>>  wrote: hello all,
>>                      when we wanna create LVM we create a
>> lvm type drive with 8e code.
>> but here we can can create lvm partation with simple
>> linux partation with code 83.
>> so here is no need to create 8e code partation....
>> any perticular reaseon behind this?
>
>It confuses me too.
>
>What does that partition type exactly mean? I mean, when we
>set it, what does it change in the partition table level,
>if it does change? And, if not, what does the partition
>type actually affect?
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 20:37:36 -0500
>From: mark 
>Subject: Re: lvm
>To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Message-ID:
><4A08D2E0.70308@xxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset>
>Edson Marquezani Filho wrote:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Joy Methew
>>>  wrote: hello all,
>>>                     when we wanna create LVM we create a
>>> lvm type drive with 8e code.
>>> but here we can can create lvm partation with simple
>>>    linux partation with code 83.
>>> so here is no need to create 8e code partation....
>>>    any perticular reaseon behind this?
>> 
>> It confuses me too.
>> 
>> What does that partition type exactly mean? I mean, when
>> we set it, what does it change in the partition table
>> level, if it does change? And, if not, what does the
>partition type actually affect?
>
>What it all matters to is the BIOS. There is *very* little
>code in the BIOS - we're talking words, we do *not* have
>even kilobytes. The BIOS has to identify what the
>partitions are, so it knows how to handle them, or whether
>to hand them off to something somewhere later in the
>bootstrap process.
>
>And if you want to see the partition types, in fdisk, if
>you go to create a partition, there is an option when it
>asks for type that will give you a full list of known
>partition types, with what they are.
>
>    mark
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:06:06 +0530
>From: navneet sharma 
>Subject: Re: lvm
>To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Message-ID:
>   
><7cbba7e60905112036n6bea076hdb92dd9bb8de40da@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset>
>hii,
>we needed to change the partition type 8e for LVM
>partitions in RHEL4 but in RHEL5 we are able to create
>with/without changing the partition type to create LVM.
>the reason is still non predictable.
>
>regards
>navneet sharma
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 7
>Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:39:54 -0500
>From: mark 
>Subject: Re: lvm
>To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Message-ID:
><4A08EF8A.5090505@xxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset>
>navneet sharma wrote:
>> hii,
>> we needed to change the partition type 8e for LVM
>>    partitions in RHEL4 but in RHEL5 we are able to create
>> with/without changing the partition type to create LVM.
>> the reason is still non predictable.
>
>That's because having the right partition type provides
>lower-level support. You can do it on a straight linux
>partition, I *think*, but it's better if you don't.
>
>    mark
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 8
>Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:45:25 +0530
>From: Joy Methew 
>Subject: horde
>To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Message-ID:
>   
><64fd0700905120115k12f077aeh13fecf92c562f846@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset>
>hello all,
>               i can see login page in horde ,now i wanna
>take authtication of user by nis server where i write in
>horde for nis authication?
>
>vim /var/www/html/horde/conf/config.php.
>
>i m confused where i write??
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 9
>Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:58:46 -0400
>From: Harry Hoffman 
>Subject: Re: horde
>To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Message-ID:
><4A097286.7060808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type:
>text/plain; charset>
>Hi Joy,
>
>It might be better to join the Horde and Imp mailing lists,
>as I'm sure  you'll get answers more quickly.
>
>Cheers,
>Harry
>
>Joy Methew wrote:
>> hello all,
>>                i can see login page in horde ,now i wanna
>> take authtication of user by nis server where i write in
>> horde for nis authication? 
>> vim /var/www/html/horde/conf/config.php.
>> 
>> i m confused where i write??
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 10
>Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 07:58:38 -0500 (CDT)
>From: Barry Brimer 
>Subject: Re: horde
>To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Message-ID:
>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset>
>On Tue, 12 May 2009, Joy Methew wrote:
>
>> hello all,
>>               i can see login page in horde ,now i wanna
>> take authtication of user by nis server where i write in
>>horde for nis authication? 
>> vim /var/www/html/horde/conf/config.php.
>>
>> i m confused where i write??
>
>There are many ways to authenticate horde users.  Are you
>using the setup  pages in the web interface?  I don't
>believe there is a direct NIS  implementation.  I use the
>IMAP authentication, and others are available.
>
>Barry
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 11
>Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:19:27 +0200
>From: "Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit Group)"
>    
>Subject: RE: Prefix question
>To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list"
> Message-ID:
>   
><34F674675D1EF848A4B9A66D6141110D040ADCE4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>root.net> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset>
>I guess I should have used a better title for this topic.
>
>It should read "rpmbuild prefix question" 
>
>The question is related to the Prefix funcitonality of
>rpmbuild spec file
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Smith
>Jack (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit Group)
>Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 10:43 AM
>To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Prefix question
>
>
>The documentation indicates that it's possible to specify
>more than one 'prefix' in the spec file, but does not
>provide an example, or explain how one could use this
>feature.
>
>"Note: You can define more than one Prefix: directive to
>list more than one top-level directory. "
>
>How does one specify the second (or further) prefix
>
>Is it simply a matter of something like this:
>
>Prefix: /usr/local
>Prefix: /usr/share
>
>wouldn't the second definition over-write the first, or is
>it cumulative ?
>
>or do do something weird (and undocumented) like appending
>subsequent prefixes with digits as in:
>
>Prefix: /usr/local
>Prefix1: /usr/share
>
>or what ?
>
>
>Secondly, once I've defined more than one prefix, what rpm
>commandline option allows me to relocate the respective
>values:
>
>rpm -Uvh --prefix>my_beautiful_package-0.001-1.i386.rpm?
>
>Or do I only have the option of specifying one prefix value
>on the commandline (which limits how flexible the
>relocation is) ?
>
>I look forward to your reply ?
>
>--
>redhat-list mailing list
>unsubscribe
>mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>__
>redhat-list mailing list
>Unsubscribe
>mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>End of redhat-list Digest, Vol 63, Issue 15
>*******************************************
 
-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subjecthttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux