Hi Ram Try the Fault Tolerant mode in bonding and check if u have any issues. edit the modprobe.conf and change the mode to mode 1 alias bond0 bonding options bond0 mode=1 miimon=100 and try restarting the machine check the machine . I had faced a similar issue where the applications will be extremely slow when we have mode 0 in bonding. this happens bcos some switches doesnt work properly with load balancing mode 0 . Regards karthik --- On Sun, 5/3/09, redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx <redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx <redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: redhat-list Digest, Vol 63, Issue 5 To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Sunday, May 3, 2009, 9:30 PM Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at redhat-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. RE: Reg : RHEL 5.0 Installatio (Geofrey Rainey) 2. find tux comic picture help (Erik Xavior) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 22:39:48 +1200 From: "Geofrey Rainey" <Geofrey.Rainey@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: Reg : RHEL 5.0 Installatio To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <FCFF2EC7A020964FBC98B17F17A88AC4018BA9F4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" You might have a faulty piece of hardware somewhere.. -----Original Message----- From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ramakrishnan Seshadhri Sent: Sunday, 3 May 2009 10:37 p.m. To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list Subject: Re: Reg : RHEL 5.0 Installatio Yes, I am aware of that. I believe so far I haven't posted any sensitive data. (Ip address is anyway should be given) I will try the test. Actually last time I was not able to connect at all. After a reboot I was able to connect. But still load is 2.8+. Ram On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Geofrey Rainey <Geofrey.Rainey@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Weird, you shouldn't be getting any packet loss at all. I wonder if > there's > Some faulty network device? Try these tests: > > 1. Ping from yourself to yourself; ping localhost, and ping the proper > qualified domain name - do you get any drops then? > > 2. Ping from another host on the same subnet, do you get any drops then? > > 3. ping from a host on a different subnet. > > (also, in future be weary of transmitting lots of information about your > servers to a mailing list, your info might be posted on the internet - > just be mindful of that). > > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ramakrishnan > Seshadhri > Sent: Sunday, 3 May 2009 10:25 p.m. > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > Subject: Re: Reg : RHEL 5.0 Installatio > > Yes during ping, packets are dropped. It gives like the one below > > [root@dbbld u02]# ping dbbld.domain.com > PING appsbld.pharmatrade.pharmatrade.com (132.1.1.126) 56(84) bytes of > data. > 64 bytes from dbbld.domain.com (132.1.1.126): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 > time=0.122 > ms > 64 bytes from dbbld.domain.com (132.1.1.126): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 > time=0.090 > ms > 64 bytes from dbbld.domain.com (132.1.1.126): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 > time=0.099 > ms > 64 bytes from dbbld.domain.com (132.1.1.126): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 > time=0.091 > ms > 64 bytes from dbbld.domain.com (132.1.1.126): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 > time=0.095 > ms > > --- dbbld.domain.com ping statistics --- > 6 packets transmitted, 5 received, 16% packet loss, time 5000ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.090/0.099/0.122/0.014 ms > > I have all host entries in place and servers registered in DNS > > Here is the output of "sar -q" > > [root@dbbld u02]# sar -q > Linux 2.6.18-53.el5PAE (dbbld) 05/03/2009 > > 09:50:01 AM runq-sz plist-sz ldavg-1 ldavg-5 ldavg-15 > 10:00:01 AM 0 189 0.12 0.08 0.06 > 10:10:01 AM 0 185 0.01 0.04 0.04 > 10:20:01 AM 0 183 0.09 0.05 0.02 > 10:30:01 AM 0 183 0.04 0.05 0.00 > 10:40:01 AM 0 185 0.05 0.06 0.00 > Average: 0 185 0.06 0.06 0.02 > > 10:46:40 AM LINUX RESTART > > 10:54:21 AM LINUX RESTART > > 11:00:01 AM runq-sz plist-sz ldavg-1 ldavg-5 ldavg-15 > 11:10:01 AM 0 173 0.03 0.12 0.21 > Average: 0 173 0.03 0.12 0.21 > > 11:22:15 AM LINUX RESTART > > 11:38:03 AM LINUX RESTART > > 11:40:01 AM runq-sz plist-sz ldavg-1 ldavg-5 ldavg-15 > 11:50:01 AM 0 189 0.61 0.72 0.53 > Average: 0 189 0.61 0.72 0.53 > > 11:59:06 AM LINUX RESTART > > 12:00:02 PM runq-sz plist-sz ldavg-1 ldavg-5 ldavg-15 > 12:10:01 PM 0 189 0.24 1.20 0.96 > 12:20:01 PM 0 188 0.09 0.22 0.52 > 12:30:01 PM 0 188 0.04 0.06 0.28 > 12:40:01 PM 0 195 3.19 1.54 0.83 > 12:50:01 PM 0 191 2.69 1.37 0.96 > 01:00:02 PM 0 192 0.15 0.73 0.82 > Average: 0 190 1.07 0.85 0.73 > > 01:04:33 PM LINUX RESTART > > 01:10:01 PM runq-sz plist-sz ldavg-1 ldavg-5 ldavg-15 > 01:20:01 PM 0 186 2.66 2.47 1.67 > 01:30:01 PM 0 176 2.58 2.64 2.12 > Average: 0 181 2.62 2.56 1.90 > > 01:55:25 PM LINUX RESTART > > 02:00:01 PM runq-sz plist-sz ldavg-1 ldavg-5 ldavg-15 > 02:10:01 PM 0 172 1.84 1.75 1.16 > 02:20:01 PM 0 171 1.84 1.84 1.47 > Average: 0 172 1.84 1.79 1.31 > > > Ram > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Geofrey Rainey > <Geofrey.Rainey@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > That logical volume for swap is pretty weird, no point in having that > > there I think, but not to worry for the moment, I don't think it would > > cause issues like you're experiencing. > > > > What's the output of "sar -q". > > > > Also, if you ping the server any other time does it always drop > packets? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ramakrishnan > > Seshadhri > > Sent: Sunday, 3 May 2009 10:13 p.m. > > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > > Subject: Re: Reg : RHEL 5.0 Installatio > > > > Here is the output for swapon -s > > > > [root@dbbld ~]# swapon -s > > Filename Type Size Used > > Priority > > /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol01 partition 950264 0 > > -1 > > /dev/sda5 partition 9438148 0 > > -2 > > > > > > Ram > > > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Geofrey Rainey > > <Geofrey.Rainey@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > > > I wouldn't worry about that zombie. What about my earlier question > > about > > > The output of swapon -s? > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ramakrishnan > > > Seshadhri > > > Sent: Sunday, 3 May 2009 10:03 p.m. > > > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > > > Subject: Re: Reg : RHEL 5.0 Installatio > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > I can see that there is a Zonbie > > > > > > [root@dbbld etc]# ps -ef | grep ifup-eth > > > root 14335 3476 1 14:02 ? 00:00:00 [ifup-eth] <defunct> > > > root 14362 6988 0 14:02 pts/2 00:00:00 grep ifup-eth > > > > > > what is this process. I am not able to kill this. > > > > > > > > > Ram.S > > > > > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Ramakrishnan Seshadhri < > > > ramakrishnan42@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Here is the ifconfig report below > > > > > > > > [root@dbbld ~]# ifconfig > > > > bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:21:5E:2D:90:5E > > > > inet addr:132.1.1.125 Bcast:132.1.255.255 > > Mask:255.255.0.0 > > > > inet6 addr: fe80::221:5eff:fe2d:905e/64 Scope:Link > > > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 > Metric:1 > > > > RX packets:1150 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > > > TX packets:961 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > > > RX bytes:93435 (91.2 KiB) TX bytes:87481 (85.4 KiB) > > > > > > > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:21:5E:2D:90:5E > > > > inet6 addr: fe80::221:5eff:fe2d:905e/64 Scope:Link > > > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > > > RX packets:1150 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > > > TX packets:961 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > > > RX bytes:93435 (91.2 KiB) TX bytes:87481 (85.4 KiB) > > > > Interrupt:114 Memory:da000000-da012100 > > > > > > > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:21:5E:2D:90:60 > > > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > > > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > > > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > > > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) > > > > Interrupt:82 Memory:d8000000-d8012100 > > > > > > > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback > > > > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 > > > > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host > > > > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > > > > RX packets:2776 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > > > TX packets:2776 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > > > RX bytes:3321472 (3.1 MiB) TX bytes:3321472 (3.1 MiB) > > > > > > > > the collision field is zero. But the TX is bytes:87481. There are > > Two > > > NIC > > > > configured to the Virtual IP bond0. Is there a problem there. > > > > Is there a log while where I could check the errors. > > > > > > > > Ram > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Geofrey Rainey > > > <Geofrey.Rainey@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > > > > > >> 1. look in the output of ifconfig and you'll see a "collisions" > > field > > > >> which should have a value of 0. > > > >> > > > >> 2. look at the output of either "ethtool <interface>", or > mii-tool > > > >> <interface>, and you will see what the port speed is. This must > > match > > > >> the port speed of your switch (your network guys will tell you if > > the > > > >> switch is > > > >> 100Mb or 1000Mb etc). > > > >> > > > >> Look for output like this which says the interface is running at > > > >> 100Mb/s. This is bad if you're connected to a 1000Mb switch. > > > >> > > > >> Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes > > > >> Speed: 100Mb/s > > > >> Duplex: Full > > > >> > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > > >> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ramakrishnan > > > >> Seshadhri > > > >> Sent: Sunday, 3 May 2009 9:30 p.m. > > > >> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > > > >> Subject: Re: Reg : RHEL 5.0 Installatio > > > >> > > > >> can you please brief how to check that. > > > >> > > > >> Ram. > > > >> > > > >> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Geofrey Rainey > > > >> <Geofrey.Rainey@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Look in "ifconfig", are there any collisions on the interface? > > > >> > > > > >> > Also, perhaps the switch hasn't properly negotiated the speed > > with > > > >> > Your interface? > > > >> > > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > > >> > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > > >> > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Ramakrishnan > > > >> > Seshadhri > > > >> > Sent: Sunday, 3 May 2009 9:18 p.m. > > > >> > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > > > >> > Subject: Re: Reg : RHEL 5.0 Installatio > > > >> > > > > >> > Actually the problem is here. Once I reboot the server the load > > is > > > >> > around > > > >> > 2.8 and I am not able to ping the server (All firewalls are > > turned > > > >> off). > > > >> > After sometime I am able to telnet or ping the server. While > > > pinging > > > >> it > > > >> > drops 50% of packets. > > > >> > both telnet and ssh services are enabled. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Ram > > > >> > > > > >> > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Geofrey Rainey > > > >> > <Geofrey.Rainey@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Also, what about the outut of the "sar" command without any > > > >> arguments? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > > > >> > > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > > >> > > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > > Ramakrishnan > > > >> > > Seshadhri > > > >> > > Sent: Sunday, 3 May 2009 9:01 p.m. > > > >> > > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > > > >> > > Subject: Re: Reg : RHEL 5.0 Installatio > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Hi, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks for the response : Here is my output of "sar -r" > command > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Linux 2.6.18-53.el5PAE (dbbld) 05/03/2009 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 09:50:01 AM kbmemfree kbmemused %memused kbbuffers kbcached > > > >> > kbswpfree > > > >> > > kbswpused %swpused kbswpcad > > > >> > > 10:00:01 AM 7400868 910644 10.96 141164 590936 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > 10:10:01 AM 7394136 917376 11.04 142056 597464 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > 10:20:01 AM 7394756 916756 11.03 142260 597464 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > 10:30:01 AM 7394632 916880 11.03 142420 597468 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > 10:40:01 AM 7394012 917500 11.04 142668 597488 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > Average: 7395681 915831 11.02 142114 596164 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 10:46:40 AM LINUX RESTART > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 10:54:21 AM LINUX RESTART > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 11:00:01 AM kbmemfree kbmemused %memused kbbuffers kbcached > > > >> > kbswpfree > > > >> > > kbswpused %swpused kbswpcad > > > >> > > 11:10:01 AM 7781624 529888 6.38 97864 300800 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > Average: 7781624 529888 6.38 97864 300800 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 11:22:15 AM LINUX RESTART > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 11:38:03 AM LINUX RESTART > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 11:40:01 AM kbmemfree kbmemused %memused kbbuffers kbcached > > > >> > kbswpfree > > > >> > > kbswpused %swpused kbswpcad > > > >> > > 11:50:01 AM 7780860 530652 6.38 89332 301896 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > Average: 7780860 530652 6.38 89332 301896 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 11:59:06 AM LINUX RESTART > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 12:00:02 PM kbmemfree kbmemused %memused kbbuffers kbcached > > > >> > kbswpfree > > > >> > > kbswpused %swpused kbswpcad > > > >> > > 12:10:01 PM 7728928 582584 7.01 135368 303512 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > 12:20:01 PM 7729052 582460 7.01 135484 303516 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > 12:30:01 PM 7728692 582820 7.01 135904 303884 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > 12:40:01 PM 286120 8025392 96.56 121840 7634772 > > > >> > > 10388412 0 0.00 0 > > > >> > > 12:50:01 PM 289640 8021872 96.52 50696 7736596 > > > >> > > 10388408 4 0.00 4 > > > >> > > Average: 4752486 3559026 42.82 115858 3256456 > > > >> > > 10388411 1 0.00 1 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > I cant see any swap usage. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Ram > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Geofrey Rainey > > > >> > > <Geofrey.Rainey@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Try the following: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > # sar -r (look at how much swap is being used) > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > # sar (is the i/o wait column high?) > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -----Original Message----- > > > >> > > > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > > >> > > > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > > > Ramakrishnan > > > >> > > > Seshadhri > > > >> > > > Sent: Sunday, 3 May 2009 7:41 p.m. > > > >> > > > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > > > >> > > > Subject: Reg : RHEL 5.0 Installatio > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Hi, > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I have installed RHEL 5 on one of the servers and once the > > > server > > > >> > > boots > > > >> > > > up > > > >> > > > the load average is constantly at 2.8 and server is slow. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Server is IBM blade by make . > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > 8 GB RAM > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > top command does not show any CPR intensive tasks. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > please let me know how to find out what is occupying CPU > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Ram > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > redhat-list mailing list > > > >> > > > unsubscribe > > > >> > mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > >> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >> > > > ========================================================== > > > >> > > > For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, > > visit > > > us > > > >> > > > online at tvnz.co.nz > > > >> > > > ========================================================== > > > >> > > > CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain > > information > > > >> that > > > >> > > > is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). > This > > > >> > > information > > > >> > > > is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or > > > >> organisation. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > redhat-list mailing list > > > >> > > > unsubscribe > > > >> > mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > >> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > -- > > > >> > > redhat-list mailing list > > > >> > > unsubscribe > > > >> mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > >> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >> > > ========================================================== > > > >> > > For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, > visit > > > us > > > >> > > online at tvnz.co.nz > > > >> > > ========================================================== > > > >> > > CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain > information > > > that > > > >> > > is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). This > > > >> > information > > > >> > > is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or > > > organisation. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -- > > > >> > > redhat-list mailing list > > > >> > > unsubscribe > > > >> mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > >> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >> > > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > redhat-list mailing list > > > >> > unsubscribe > > > mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >> > ================================================== > > > >> > ======== > > > >> > For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit > > us > > > >> > online at tvnz.co.nz > > > >> > ========================================================== > > > >> > CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain information > > > that > > > >> > is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). This > > > >> information > > > >> > is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or > > > organisation. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > redhat-list mailing list > > > >> > unsubscribe > > > mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > >> redhat-list mailing list > > > >> unsubscribe > > mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >> ========================================================== > > > >> For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit > us > > > >> online at tvnz.co.nz > > > >> ========================================================== > > > >> CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain information > > that > > > >> is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). This > > > information > > > >> is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or > > organisation. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> redhat-list mailing list > > > >> unsubscribe > > mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > redhat-list mailing list > > > unsubscribe > mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > ========================================================== > > > For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit us > > > online at tvnz.co.nz > > > ========================================================== > > > CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain information that > > > is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). This > > information > > > is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or organisation. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > redhat-list mailing list > > > unsubscribe > mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > ========================================================== > > For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit us > > online at tvnz.co.nz > > ========================================================== > > CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain information that > > is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). This > information > > is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or organisation. > > > > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ========================================================== > For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit us > online at tvnz.co.nz > ========================================================== > CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain information that > is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). This information > is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or organisation. > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ========================================================== For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit us online at tvnz.co.nz ========================================================== CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain information that is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). This information is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or organisation. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:25:00 +0200 From: Erik Xavior <erikxavior80@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: find tux comic picture help To: debian-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx, centos@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <a7e963770905030725l7badce8dn488e5240a672bdea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 does anyone knows/have that comic picture of "tux" the Linux penguin that: - has four pictures in it - it defines 4 "levels" of the knowledge of tux, who is "symbolizing a learning person" - the first one: tux is just a Linux "fanboy"; second: tux is working, and say's: "...stupid rpm"; three: I can't remember that:D sorry; four: tux has a beard, and the picture says don't mess with it. thank you, and sorry for the question, but I just can't find it on google :D :S ------------------------------ __ redhat-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list End of redhat-list Digest, Vol 63, Issue 5 ****************************************** -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subjecthttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
