Hello Ken:
I've been working on something similar. Have a look at
the proposal I sent to my boss. This is just a rough draft.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Kenneth Holter <kenneho.ndu@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> We're running rsyslog 2.0.6 downloaded from RHN, and are about to set up
> reliability/failover. I've found two setup tutorials for this:
>
>
> 1. http://www.rsyslog.com/doc-rsyslog_reliable_forwarding.html
> 2. http://wiki.rsyslog.com/index.php/FailoverSyslogServer
>
> It seems like both setups configure reliable transfer, but using a
> completely different syntax. Is it so that the former one is the syntax for
> newer versions of rsyslog?
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Kenneth
>
>
> On 1/26/09, Kenneth Holter <kenneho.ndu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hello list.
> >
> >
> > I'm planning on setting up rsyslog servers (i.e. loghosts) to store
> syslog
> > messages from the various RHEL clients in the network. So far I have one
> > "master" server, and one relay server who forwards syslog messages to the
> > master server. The clients log either directly to the master, or to the
> > relay server. In other words, this:
> > Syslog clients ==> Relay rsyslog server ==> Master rsyslog server <==
> Syslog
> > clients
> >
> > It's possible to define failover behavior on the client side, either:
> >
> > Try one rsyslog server before spooling the messages
> > Try two or more rsyslog servers before spooling the messages
> > In the latter scenario one will need multiple failover rsyslog servers.
> But
> > since the clients are able to spool the messages, and forward them as
> soon
> > as the rsyslog server comes back up, I'm thinking that one rsyslog server
> > (one relay server and one master server, that is) will suffice. As long
> as
> > the messages are just temporarily stored locally, no messages should be
> > lost.
> >
> > Has anyone set up rsyslog (or other syslog-implementations) with failover
> > functionality, and would like to comment on these alternatives?
> >
> > Furhtermore, our RHEL clients are currently running sysklogd, so if there
> is
> > some way of setting up failover syslog server without having to upgrade
> to
> > rsyslog I'd appreciate a howto on this. I'm don't think this is a likely
> > approach, since TCP (as is supported in the rsyslog implementation) seems
> > like the best alternative when setting up failover.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kenneth Holter
> >
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
--
Ezra Taylor
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
