> Mazda Motor Logistics Europe NV, Blaasveldstraat 162, B-2830 Willebroek VAT BE 0406.024.281, RPR Mechelen, ING 310-0092504-52, IBAN : BE64 3100 0925 0452, SWIFT : BBRUBEBB -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Karl-Olov Serrander > Sent: maandag 26 januari 2009 13:45 > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Problem with version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 > > Hi ! > > Trying to run an old licensserver (said to be compiled on RHEL4) on > RHEL5 i get: > ./vendordaemon: relocation error: ./vendordaemon: symbol errno, version > GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference > > Got the same message from Flexlm lmgrd 8.2a but upgrading that to > 11.4.0.0 solved that but then the vendordaemon > started to complain (it was not started att all when lmgrd failed). > > I am arguing with the vendor that he should recompile on RHEL5 with a > more recent lmgrd, > but should't stuff complied on RHEL4 work on RHEL5 ? > > I suspect that it is really compiled on something older, but how can i > see that from the binary ? > > Any hints ? > > And starting on RHEL4 gives: Incorrectly built binary which accesses > errno or h_errno directly. Needs to be fixed. > but it works on RHEL4. > > Regards > -- > Karl-Olov Serrander m11172.abc.se The libc.so.6 file is part of glibc. RHEL4 comes with glibc 2.3 whereas RHEL5 comes with glibc 2.5. So it makes sense that applications compiled against glibc-2.3 will not run properly on RHEL5. Regards Bram -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
