Re: VMWare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jose R R wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Paul M. Whitney <paul.whitney@xxxxxxx>
> wrote: [...]
>> I also use this technology at work with VMWare Infrastructure 3. Very
>> powerful. There are other options in the market today such as Xen (Red
>> Hat), Citrix, and even Windows Hypervisor. But they all seem to be playing
>> catchup to VMWare's capability. [...]
> 
> "seem" is not an objective statement and it simply narrows the vision and
> scope of virtualization.  The multiple iterations of Xen into so many
> different vendors' implementations, like Red Hat and Fedora, Debian/Ubuntu,
> Novell's SuSE and OpenSuSE, Oracle's OVS, Sun Microsystems xVM, simply shows
> that, in the long run, Xen has the most potential for a truly connected
> multi-vendor infrastructure to The Cloud.

That may be the case, but I'm *jobhunting*, and what everyone (>90%) want is
VMware.

	mark

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux