Thanks for your reply. 500 GBs sounds quite a lot. We have around 200 servers, and they're usually not producing too much logging (most of our applications have their own logging, and doens't rely on syslog). I was hoping there maybe was some sort of formula defining the avarage number of GBs logging pr server pr year, or something like that. On 11/4/08, Rohit khaladkar <rohit.khaladkar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well depends on the type of usage, but I guess 500 GB should be more than > sufficient. > Thanks! > Rohit Khaladkar > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Kenneth Holter <kenneho.ndu@xxxxxxxxx > >wrote: > > > Hello list. > > > > > > > > We're about to set up a centralized syslog server, and were wondering if > > there are any rules of thumbs regarding the size of the disk. > > > > Regards, > > Kenneth Holter > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
