Re: Virtualizing KDE's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Um, why not simply run the KDE server on those machines, with the one server
> being the client (remember, X has the words client and server bass ackwards
> from everyone else's use of the terms)? I mean, I could install something
> like
> Chameleon, or any of the F/OSS that runs under WinDoze; if the other boxes
> you want to run 'em on are Linux, that's not even a problem.

I'm not very familiar with X to be honest so am not sure of it's capabilities. I think it would be perfect for what I'm talking about, basic machines for email, web browsing etc.

I don't want to change their machines, I just want them to be able to have a work environment that I can maintain. I was thinking vm because all it takes is a little client and they have remote access to a centralized server. I also have a bunch of machines running various things which do nothing else. It would be better to move those to a vm environment.

So, partly, it's to learn, mostly, it's to eventually be able to use it.

Mike


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux