Re: Renicing and disk usage priority

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You can have a look at the manual page for the ionice. I believe you will get your answers there. In short, the simple 'nice' will take care of the CPU cycles, but that does not always mean an optimum IO performance, because that depends on the rest of the process workload and whether your system will try to be fair to the other processes based on the peculiarities of the processes you are running . ionice will let you fine-tune the IO requirements of your processes in a better way. The examples at the end of the manual page are indicative of what you can do.

Best regards,
GM




Kristoffer Knigga wrote:
Hello, all,

I have a server that's running a bunch of processes that I believe are disk bound.  The server is an 8-way machine running at about 60% idle, and each process averages about 3% of one processor (they are all single threaded).

Now, I have one of these processes that I need to have running at a higher priority when it comes to disk access.  Does renicing a process effect its ability to fight for disk resources, or just processor?

Thanks!

Kris Knigga


--
--
George Magklaras

Senior Computer Systems Engineer/UNIX Systems Administrator
EMBnet Technical Management Board
The Biotechnology Centre of Oslo,
University of Oslo
http://folk.uio.no/georgios



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux