On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 15:36 -0400, Furnish, Trever G wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jose R R > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:43 PM > > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > > Subject: Re: paravirtualized 32-bit on 64-bit host? > > > > On 3/7/08, Furnish, Trever G <TGFurnish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Anyone managed to get a paravirtualized 32-bit guest working on a > > > 64-bit redhat host? The RHEL5.1 release notes claim > > there's preview > > > support for it. If by "technology preview" they mean, "We tried it > > > and it didn't work", then yeah, I guess there's support. But I'm > > > having no luck. :-( > > > > > > > > > > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/release-no > > > te > > > s/RELEASE-NOTES-U1-x86_64-en.html > > > > > > Anyone else fairing better? > > > > > > -- > > > Trever > > > > > > > Well last year I installed a 32-bit WinXP instance under > > 64-bit OpenSuSE host implementation of Xen. > > Of course, proprietary technology is not actually > > paravirtualized, but rather fully virutalized with the help > > of the (AMD CPU in my specific case) hardware extensions. > > You can find an overview of what I did, if interested of course, at: > > http://www.metztli-it.com/blog/index.php?blog=4&title=open-sou > > rce-on-sun-microsystems-sun-ultr-20&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1 > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Jose R Rodriguez > > http://www.metztli-it.com > > Thanks, Jose. I was hoping to avoid full virtualization due to the > reported performance impacts, but perhaps that'll just have to wait. > And you were the only one who even responded -- much appreciated! > > See also this thread branch. It will still be tech-preview in release 5.2. https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2008-March/msg00176.html n. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
