Re: differences in the time precision used within linux can bite you

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



krishnaakishore@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> @Bruke: I don't think that is what he is referring to. The problem was
> with preserving timestamps when the copy is being made.
> 
> It has got something to do with struct timespec, struct timeval usage
> may be. Just a guess.

Here's a thought: could the cp be 32-bit code, and the timestamp struct shown
by ls be 64-bit?

	mark

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux