RE: Failover IP router

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Barry,

I was told that it is free for RED HAT 5 Advance Platform

You have to pay for it otherwise, around $499, I think

Néstor :-).

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Barry Brimer
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:30 PM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: RE: Failover IP router


Red Hat Cluster Suite is included in RHEL 5 but is an add-on for RHEL 3 and RHEL
4.  For completeness, it was included in RHEL 2.1 AS and was not available as an
 add-on for RHEL 2.1 ES.

Before RHCS, I used to use keepalived with LVS.

Quoting "Florez, Nestor" <NFlorez@xxxxxxxxx>:

> Steven,
>
> I am trying to do the exact same thing and I even open
> a ticket with red hat and all the can tell me is that I
> need to purchase the cluster suite http://www.redhat.com/cluster_suite/
>
> what did people do before the cluster suite was around.
>
> I trying to duplicate the systems with clonezilla or
> systemimager.
>
> SO far for failover I have heard of hearbeat (this is one of the packages
> that the cluster suite uses) and DRDB here is an article:
>  http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9074
>  http://linux-ha.org/LearningAboutHeartbeat
>
> If you find out more please let me know because I am in the same search path.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Néstor :-)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Steven Buehler
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 1:16 PM
> To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
> Subject: Failover IP router
>
>
> I have been googleing for this, but can't seem to find the right answer.
> What I am trying to do is to create a failover router on a redhat box.
> 1.  website.com will be on 2 servers
> 2.  website.com has one IP address
> 3.  redhat box router will have the 1 IP address for website.com on it.
> 4.  website.com server1 will be on 192.168.1.10
> 5.  website.com server2 will be on 192.168.1.11
> 6.  If website.com server1 fails, website.com server2 will take over.
>
> We are not worried about cookies that have been set on server1 to be moved
> to server2.  We are just worried about the second machine taking over.  What
> would be better is if it could be a load balancing setup so that it will use
> both servers, but if one fails, people will not notice it because the other
> server will then be taking all of the requests.
>
> I have googled for "Linux failover iptables router" and a few other
> combinations of words, but what I keep finding is failover for the outbound
> connections.  Having 3 Nic cards 1 going to one ISP, 1 going to another ISP
> and one going to the internal network.  Maybe I am just using the wrong
> wording.  Any url links for instructions would be appreciated.
>
> Thank You
> Steve
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
> !DSPAM:474c9422207491080583432!
>
>



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux