Barry, I was told that it is free for RED HAT 5 Advance Platform You have to pay for it otherwise, around $499, I think Néstor :-). -----Original Message----- From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Barry Brimer Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:30 PM To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list Subject: RE: Failover IP router Red Hat Cluster Suite is included in RHEL 5 but is an add-on for RHEL 3 and RHEL 4. For completeness, it was included in RHEL 2.1 AS and was not available as an add-on for RHEL 2.1 ES. Before RHCS, I used to use keepalived with LVS. Quoting "Florez, Nestor" <NFlorez@xxxxxxxxx>: > Steven, > > I am trying to do the exact same thing and I even open > a ticket with red hat and all the can tell me is that I > need to purchase the cluster suite http://www.redhat.com/cluster_suite/ > > what did people do before the cluster suite was around. > > I trying to duplicate the systems with clonezilla or > systemimager. > > SO far for failover I have heard of hearbeat (this is one of the packages > that the cluster suite uses) and DRDB here is an article: > http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9074 > http://linux-ha.org/LearningAboutHeartbeat > > If you find out more please let me know because I am in the same search path. > > Thanks, > > Néstor :-) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Steven Buehler > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 1:16 PM > To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list' > Subject: Failover IP router > > > I have been googleing for this, but can't seem to find the right answer. > What I am trying to do is to create a failover router on a redhat box. > 1. website.com will be on 2 servers > 2. website.com has one IP address > 3. redhat box router will have the 1 IP address for website.com on it. > 4. website.com server1 will be on 192.168.1.10 > 5. website.com server2 will be on 192.168.1.11 > 6. If website.com server1 fails, website.com server2 will take over. > > We are not worried about cookies that have been set on server1 to be moved > to server2. We are just worried about the second machine taking over. What > would be better is if it could be a load balancing setup so that it will use > both servers, but if one fails, people will not notice it because the other > server will then be taking all of the requests. > > I have googled for "Linux failover iptables router" and a few other > combinations of words, but what I keep finding is failover for the outbound > connections. Having 3 Nic cards 1 going to one ISP, 1 going to another ISP > and one going to the internal network. Maybe I am just using the wrong > wording. Any url links for instructions would be appreciated. > > Thank You > Steve > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > !DSPAM:474c9422207491080583432! > > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
