>Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:20:22 -0500 >From: "Litton, Tom - CEPM" <Tom.Litton@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >I would recommend subversion (http://subversion.tigris.org/) instead of >cvs. I like it a lot better. I knew subversion would come up. We use it at work. I do *NOT* like it. Reason 1: it looks like you have to check out a whole directory, and that you can't check out just one file. Speaking as someone who did, among other things, configuration management for about 11 years, I *HATE* this idea, since if you've got multiple developers, and one is working on one file in a directory, and another on another file in the same directory.... I won't start on the aggro here, where they normally *don't* lock the checked out files... which is exactly what version control is supposed to prevent. mark "why, yes, most of that time was with PVCS" -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
