Re: RHCS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have some questions:
- What is the difference between Redhat cluster suite and other open source
HA

I have not compared RHCS to other open source HA systems

- What is a cluster manager ?Is this the same as Cluster suite?

A cluster manager is one piece of software included in a cluster suite.

- Can I implement a server cluster using cluster suite without having a
shared external disk if the services do not need to share the data?

I believe this could be accomplished, provided you use lock_dlm in RHCS

- if i want to implement RHCS on 2x nodes to use the external storage, what
are the requirmnts for the SAN switch and SAN storage in case i go for
External .Fiber chaneel storage

You must simply have FC cards that have driver support for your OS. You must also have a fencing mechanism (method of abruptly rebooting a non-working node, to ensure that the non-working node can not come back to life and cause data corruption) which *can* be done through your SAN switch, in which case I would look at the different fencing agents in RHCS. When available, I prefer a fencing mechanism like HP ILO, Dell Drac, or a network power switch. I have never used I/O fencing with a SAN switch.

- what about GFS license?

GFS (when used in a cluster) requires RHCS. If you don't intend to share a disk between your nodes, GFS is not needed. That being said, Red Hat provides a copy of RHCS with every copy of GFS. GFS and RHCS are available under the GPL and with support from Red Hat.

- If I want to use load balancing , can I use the RH cluster suite.

Yes. RHCS includes lvs (linux virtual server) with the Piranha management/configuration tool. It even supports having a failover load balancer.


- Can some one guide me the minimum hardware requirement for the cluster
suite?

It more depends on what you actually intend to do with it. I use RHCS on HP intel hardware. Nothing special. If the hardware is robust enough to run your application(s) it shouldn't take much more to run RHCS as well.

- Am thinking as a second option to use Hardware Load balancer form juniper
or cisco to resolve the issue of cluster.

I am about to put in a pair of RHCS/lvs load balancers to replace a hardware load balancer. It will give me redundancy and flexibility at commodity prices.

HTH,
Barry

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux