yeah .. its Saturday night ;-) things like this happens . however, I still prefer to set the apache user as a group .... On 9/3/06, Manuel Arostegui Ramirez <manuel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
El Domingo, 3 de Septiembre de 2006 10:57, Ali Hamad escribió: > > Hello : > I do think that public_html should has > ( Apache user ):User permission. I think you're misunderstanding this thread, I'm not the one who have problems with Apache and the DocumentRoot. My Apache works perfectly ;-) > > as example , if the user who runs Apache is nobody , the permission of the > public_html folder should be : > USER:nobody. Actually, that's not really true. If you have 755 permission on the directory, any user could read on it, nobody, apache or whatever. I agree that is a good idea to set nobody or apache as a group. Above was just a comment ;-) > > another example is : > drwxr-x--- 22 ali nobody 4096 Sep 3 04:44 public_html > where (ali) is the username of my own website and nobody is the user who > runs Apache . Try giving 755 to the directory and change the group: chown ali. public_html/ Apache will be able to read on it :-) Anyway, Nirav, the guy with the Apache problem, wrote that he have checked all permission issue. Cheers -- Manuel Arostegui Ramirez. Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subjecthttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
