I find it interesting that you wrote "parenthetically" inside of parenthesis... Did you get permission from the Minister of Redundancy Minister for that? -----Original Message----- From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of darrel barton Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 1:10 PM To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Commentary on the seven words I'd like to apologize to EVERYONE .... if even one of you thinks that this was intended to be a flame! This was nothing but COMMENTARY on an attitude that is prevalent among people who hold support knowledge when approached by people who need help. I'm not immune myself -- when one of my end users calls and asks how to delete all clients East of the Mississippi, I ALSO take a moment to ask what it's about. I just take a split second to try to remind myself that I design the software, I don't dictate who uses it or for what purpose. It was just a commentary about something we all give into once in a while and nothing more. (Parenthetically, if anyone actually thought what I wrote was an actual FLAME .... all I can say is "Man, you need to unplug and get OUT a bit more! :)" ) At 09:00 AM 8/28/2006, you wrote: >Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to > redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > >You can reach the person managing the list at > redhat-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. partition changing (Anze Vidmar) > 2. RE: partition changing (Northrup, Wilson) > 3. RE: Commentary on the seven words (Shekhar Dhotre) > 4. RE: partition changing (Shekhar Dhotre) > 5. Wield message on log file (Redhat AS 4)?? (mcclnx mcc) > 6. bad RAM chip cause DELL 2650 continue crash (mcclnx mcc) > 7. RE: Wield message on log file (Redhat AS 4)?? (Shekhar Dhotre) > 8. Re: Wield message on log file (Redhat AS 4)?? > (Manuel Arostegui Ramirez) > 9. Re: Wield message on log file (Redhat AS 4)?? (Matt Domsch) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:36:56 +0200 >From: Anze Vidmar <anzevi@xxxxxxxxx> >Subject: partition changing >To: redhat-list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: <1156768616.4312.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain > >hello my guru friends :) > >On a web hosting server we have silly partitioning like this: > >[anze@yokohama ~]$ df -h >Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >/dev/sda1 6.7G 4.4G 2.0G 69% / >/dev/sda2 150G 1G 149G 1% /home >/dev/sda4 18G 17G 1G 97% /var > >(don't ask, I wasn't designing this :) > >So, I would like to swap partition /home with /var, because /var >partition (where all the web hosting files are saved) are running out >of disk space. The partition system id on both partitions is Linux. In >theory this is no problem. But I'm not sure if this is safe to do while >in runlevel 3 (the server is in another country and i don't have a >chance to go there to boot into single mode for maintaining). > >So, the only way would be: > >- stop the Internet/database services (at least this can be done) on >the server >- backup /var and /home partitions in *.tar file (to keep permissions) >- unmount the /var and /home partitions >- edit the /etc/fstab file to correct mount point >- mount the new /var partition and extract the backup tar file there >- mount the /home partition and extract the backup tar file there >- cross my fingers and hope not to get burned :-/ > >Of course I would clean the two partitions before restoring backup >files on them. Is this method acceptable? >Thank you, > >-- >Anze Vidmar <anzevi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:55:59 -0400 >From: "Northrup, Wilson" <wilson_northrup@xxxxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: partition changing >To: "'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'" > <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'redhat-list'" > <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: > <DBA68BCB137F86449139FDB06E59113CFC9F91@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain > >I guess you could copy the files in /var/www to /home/www, and confirm >they are copied correctly. Once that is done you could delete the >files in /var/www and symlink to /home/www right away, or run for a >week with the symlink, and then delete the files after that time. > >In any case, make a backup and check to ensure it is a good backup >before you start. > > > > > >wilson > > > -----Original Message----- >From: Anze Vidmar [mailto:anzevi@xxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 08:37 AM Eastern Standard Time >To: redhat-list >Subject: partition changing > >hello my guru friends :) > >On a web hosting server we have silly partitioning like this: > >[anze@yokohama ~]$ df -h >Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >/dev/sda1 6.7G 4.4G 2.0G 69% / >/dev/sda2 150G 1G 149G 1% /home >/dev/sda4 18G 17G 1G 97% /var > >(don't ask, I wasn't designing this :) > >So, I would like to swap partition /home with /var, because /var >partition (where all the web hosting files are saved) are running out >of disk space. The partition system id on both partitions is Linux. In >theory this is no problem. But I'm not sure if this is safe to do while >in runlevel 3 (the server is in another country and i don't have a >chance to go there to boot into single mode for maintaining). > >So, the only way would be: > >- stop the Internet/database services (at least this can be done) on >the server >- backup /var and /home partitions in *.tar file (to keep permissions) >- unmount the /var and /home partitions >- edit the /etc/fstab file to correct mount point >- mount the new /var partition and extract the backup tar file there >- mount the /home partition and extract the backup tar file there >- cross my fingers and hope not to get burned :-/ > >Of course I would clean the two partitions before restoring backup >files on them. Is this method acceptable? >Thank you, > >-- >Anze Vidmar <anzevi@xxxxxxxxx> > >-- >redhat-list mailing list >unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >------- >Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains >information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, >New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known >outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD >and in Japan, as Banyu - direct contact information for affiliates is >available at http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be >confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is >intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this >message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this >message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then >delete it from your system. > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >------- > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:37:43 -0400 >From: "Shekhar Dhotre" <sdhotre@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: Commentary on the seven words >To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: > <728BB500F390334196448BD09D34254E0A3F37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > >>guy who started the flame :-) > > I think I made this list alive :-) > >-----Original Message----- >From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Manuel Arostegui >Ramirez >Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 5:21 AM >To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list >Subject: Re: Commentary on the seven words > >El Viernes, 25 de Agosto de 2006 20:10, darrel barton escribió: > > > > > So when a guy writes to ask about how to enable root login from > > telnet, can't someone just say "I hope you know that's not as secure > > as ssh -- but here's how you enable that ...... ? > >That's exactly what I did. Look at this: >https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2006-August/msg00216.html > > >If you read whole thread you'll see that the one who asked about how to >enable root login via telnet is not the same guy who started the flame >:-) > >Greetings >-- >Manuel Arostegui Ramirez. > >Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should >not be used for urgent or sensitive issues. > >-- >redhat-list mailing list >unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:40:34 -0400 >From: "Shekhar Dhotre" <sdhotre@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: partition changing >To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: > <728BB500F390334196448BD09D34254E0A3F3A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > >>Is this method acceptable? > > Test the restore of tar backups or any other backups ,before you >clean out the partitions. I have successfully completed 4 DR test,and >my experience tells me always test your backups by restoring to test >machines . >(2 sets of backups) > >-----Original Message----- >From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anze Vidmar >Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 8:37 AM >To: redhat-list >Subject: partition changing > >hello my guru friends :) > >On a web hosting server we have silly partitioning like this: > >[anze@yokohama ~]$ df -h >Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >/dev/sda1 6.7G 4.4G 2.0G 69% / >/dev/sda2 150G 1G 149G 1% /home >/dev/sda4 18G 17G 1G 97% /var > >(don't ask, I wasn't designing this :) > >So, I would like to swap partition /home with /var, because /var >partition (where all the web hosting files are saved) are running out >of disk space. The partition system id on both partitions is Linux. In >theory this is no problem. But I'm not sure if this is safe to do while >in runlevel 3 (the server is in another country and i don't have a >chance to go there to boot into single mode for maintaining). > >So, the only way would be: > >- stop the Internet/database services (at least this can be done) on >the server >- backup /var and /home partitions in *.tar file (to keep permissions) >- unmount the /var and /home partitions >- edit the /etc/fstab file to correct mount point >- mount the new /var partition and extract the backup tar file there >- mount the /home partition and extract the backup tar file there >- cross my fingers and hope not to get burned :-/ > >Of course I would clean the two partitions before restoring backup >files on them. Is this method acceptable? >Thank you, > >-- >Anze Vidmar <anzevi@xxxxxxxxx> > >-- >redhat-list mailing list >unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 5 >Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:47:06 +0800 (CST) >From: mcclnx mcc <mcclnx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Wield message on log file (Redhat AS 4)?? >To: nahant-list@xxxxxxxxxx, as <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, > linux-poweredge@xxxxxxxx >Message-ID: <20060828134706.18988.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 > >We have Redhat AS4.3 on DELL 6800 server. I checked /var/log/messages >anf found message: > > Aug 28 04:03:42 ORA01 init: Trying to re-exec init > >Any one what is this mean? > >___________________________________________________ > ³Ì·sª© Yahoo!©_¼¯§Y®É³q°T 7.0¡A§K¶Oºô¸ô¹q¸Ü¥ô§A¥´¡I > http://messenger.yahoo.com.tw/ > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 6 >Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:51:31 +0800 (CST) >From: mcclnx mcc <mcclnx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: bad RAM chip cause DELL 2650 continue crash >To: linux-poweredge@xxxxxxxx, as <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: <20060828135131.99032.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 > >We have DELL 2650 server with Redhat AS 3.4 installed on it. Recently >I found following messages on log file and server continue crash . > >Aug 26 10:10:49 ORA1 kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received. >Dazed and confused, but trying to continue Aug 26 10:10:49 ORA1 kernel: >You probably have a hardware problem with your RAM chips > >I replace all RAM on DELL 2650, but it still continue happen. > >Anyone know what wrong it is? > >Thanks. > >___________________________________________________ > ³Ì·sª© Yahoo!©_¼¯§Y®É³q°T 7.0¡A§K¶Oºô¸ô¹q¸Ü¥ô§A¥´¡I > http://messenger.yahoo.com.tw/ > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 7 >Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:52:06 -0400 >From: "Shekhar Dhotre" <sdhotre@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: Wield message on log file (Redhat AS 4)?? >To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, > <nahant-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-poweredge@xxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: > <728BB500F390334196448BD09D34254E0A3F3D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" > >Sounds as if someone/something (cron.daily -> prelink?) with root >permissions simply issued 'init u'. > >Hint: >man init > > >It`s cut and paste! > >-----Original Message----- >From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of mcclnx mcc >Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:47 AM >To: nahant-list@xxxxxxxxxx; as; linux-poweredge@xxxxxxxx >Subject: Wield message on log file (Redhat AS 4)?? > >We have Redhat AS4.3 on DELL 6800 server. I checked /var/log/messages >anf found message: > > Aug 28 04:03:42 ORA01 init: Trying to re-exec init > >Any one what is this mean? > >___________________________________________________ > ×îаæ Yahoo!ÆæĦ¼´•rÍ¨Ó 7.0£¬ÃâÙM¾W·ëŠÔ’ÈÎÄã´ò£¡ > http://messenger.yahoo.com.tw/ > >-- >redhat-list mailing list >unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 8 >Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:05:23 +0200 >From: Manuel Arostegui Ramirez <manuel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: Wield message on log file (Redhat AS 4)?? >To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: <200608281605.23605.manuel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >El Lunes, 28 de Agosto de 2006 15:47, mcclnx mcc escribió: > > We have Redhat AS4.3 on DELL 6800 server. I checked > > /var/log/messages anf found message: > > > > Aug 28 04:03:42 ORA01 init: Trying to re-exec init > > > > Any one what is this mean? > > > >It's due to cron.daily and prelink. >Try to disable prelinking > >Hope that helps > >-- >Manuel Arostegui Ramirez. > >Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should >not be used for urgent or sensitive issues. > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 9 >Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:05:43 -0500 >From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: Wield message on log file (Redhat AS 4)?? >To: mcclnx mcc <mcclnx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >Cc: nahant-list@xxxxxxxxxx, as <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, > linux-poweredge@xxxxxxxx >Message-ID: <20060828140542.GD15032@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:47:06PM +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote: > > We have Redhat AS4.3 on DELL 6800 server. I checked > > /var/log/messages anf found message: > > > > Aug 28 04:03:42 ORA01 init: Trying to re-exec init > > > > Any one what is this mean? > >Generally that you ran up2date and it updated glibc. > >-- >Matt Domsch >Software Architect >Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell >mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com > > > >------------------------------ > >__ >redhat-list mailing list >Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > >End of redhat-list Digest, Vol 30, Issue 29 >******************************************* > > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/428 - Release Date: >8/25/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/428 - Release Date: 8/25/2006 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
