Re: routes question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I haven't had much time at all to test it, but from the few minutes
that I've played around with it , it seems to work after I set the
default gateway. With:

route add default gw 130.111.68.1

Even after reboots, with the cable unplugged. Next week when I get
more time to test it, I'll look at it further and test both of your
suggestions and let you know what I find.

Thank you for your suggestions.

Romeo

On 6/14/06, nilesh vaghela <nileshj.vaghela@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
try to give gateway at /etc/sysconfig/network

GATEWAY=XX.XX.XX.XX
 remove it from both the nic.

then restrt the network services.

#service network restart.

then check route -n

Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
Iface
220.226.132.128 0.0.0.0         255.255.255.128 U     0      0        0 eth1
192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     0      0        0 eth0
0.0.0.0         220.226.132.129 0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth1

Some thing like last line should be apear.

Hope this will help you.

On 6/13/06, Romeo Theriault <romeotheriault@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've setup a gateway/router for a small internal network that we are
> using to disinfect virus ridden windows machines. eth0 serves the ip's
> to the internal network (192.168.1.1) and eth1 is connected to the
> internet (130.111.68.110).
>
> This works very well, except when I start the machine with the eth0
> network cable unplugged and then plug it back in after the machine has
> started. When this happens, people are still able to get an ip but are
> not able to get out on the internet. If I go on the server and try to
> ping something, it doesn't work, it's trying to use eth0 to ping and
> is getting a host unreachable. A restart with the cable plugged in
> seems to fix it.
>
> I'm thinking this has to do with setting routes. Though I'm not sure
> what routes are appropriate to set. Should eth0's route be
> 130.111.68.1? Does this sound like a route problem?
>
> Here is the output of the routes command:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
> Iface
> 192.168.1.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
> eth0
> 130.111.68.0    *               255.255.254.0   U     0      0        0
> eth1
> 169.254.0.0     *               255.255.0.0     U     0      0        0
> eth1
>
>
> Here are the contents from my ifcfg-ethx scripts:
> #eth0:
> # Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+
> DEVICE=eth0
> ONBOOT=yes
> BOOTPROTO=static
> IPADDR=192.168.1.1
> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> GATEWAY=192.168.1.254
> HWADDR=00:30:BD:05:65:DF
>
>
> #eth1
> DEVICE=eth1
> BOOTPROTO=static
> IPADDR=130.111.68.110
> NETMASK=255.255.254.0
> GATEWAY=130.111.68.1
> HWADDR=00:C0:A8:F1:EF:39
> ONBOOT=yes
> TYPE=Ethernet
>
>
> and here is my ifconfig:
>
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:30:BD:05:65:DF
>           inet addr:192.168.1.1  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::230:bdff:fe05:65df/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:259 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:353 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:28915 (28.2 KiB)  TX bytes:222329 (217.1 KiB)
>           Interrupt:11 Base address:0xc400
>
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:C0:A8:F1:EF:39
>           inet addr:130.111.68.110  Bcast:130.111.69.255  Mask:
> 255.255.254.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::2c0:a8ff:fef1:ef39/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:238459 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:2361 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:19817771 (18.8 MiB)  TX bytes:234701 (229.2 KiB)
>
> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>           RX packets:27 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:27 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:12146 (11.8 KiB)  TX bytes:12146 (11.8 KiB)
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for anyone giving me some hints.
>
> Romeo
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



--
Nilesh Vaghela
ElectroMech
Redhat Channel Partner and Training Partner
74, Nalanda Complex, Satellite Rd, Ahmedabad
25, The Emperor, Fatehgunj, Baroda.
www.electromech.info
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux