> -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Northrup, Wilson > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:15 AM > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > Subject: RE: 64-bit for redhat EL, please give advice > > This is the current DL360 model is actually the DL360p. You may recall > that > they released the DL360p (performance) model shortly after PCMag published > benchmarks proving the Dell 1850 was a faster box. The DL360p was > intended > to re-take the lead from Dell: > > In any event, details on the currently shipping DL360p: > http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12166_na/12166_na.html > > As you'll note, the above says; > "64-bit Intel(r) Xeon(tm) processors supporting 64-bit extension and 64- > bit > Microsoft Windows and Linux operating systems" > > Please note that the DL360 has been using Intel Xeon DP processors which > support Intel's EM64T extensions for quite some time now. This is not a > recent development. The DL380 mentioned elsewhere in this thread also > uses > the same processors. We have a few hundred of each. > > Since there are also some comments about Opteron, I will tell you that the > DL385 _Opteron_ based system _blows_the_doors_off_ the DL360/DL380 Xeon's > for very high percentage of our apps in both short and long modes (32 or > 64bit modes that is...) There are a few apps we have where the Opterons > are not faster or optimal for what we do, but there are not many. I started buying DL385's for my environment middle of last year and have never looked back. I just got a few dual core 2.6GHz systems in waiting to be deployed. We primarily run Oracle on them (RAC) and data processing applications that are pretty memory bandwidth dependent. Btw, if someone missed it AMD had bad batch of CPU's with an FPU bug shipped last year. HP will dispatch someone to test the CPU's and replace them if needed. > > > Good luck. > wilson > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Bliss, Aaron > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 10:57 AM > To: Ed Wilts; General Red Hat Linux discussion list > Subject: RE: 64-bit for redhat EL, please give advice > > I'll have to double check the 360 g4, but definitely the 380 g4's are > running xeon processors. > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:49 AM > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > Subject: Re: 64-bit for redhat EL, please give advice > > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 08:20:47AM -0400, Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > Hp proliant's g4 models (dl360, 380) run great; they have xeon > > processors; redhat es 3 64 bit screams....never have any issues... > > You sure? The DL360 and DL380 systems are 32-bit... The DL385 is > 64-bit Opteron-based. There is no 64-bit DL360 replacement model yet. > > .../Ed > > -- > Ed Wilts, RHCE > Mounds View, MN, USA > mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx > Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > Confidentiality Notice: > The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the > exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain > privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is > not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver > it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, > distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately > by telephone and destroy the copies you received. > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > ---- > Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains > information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New > Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the > United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as > Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity > named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have > received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e- > mail and then delete it from your system. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > ---- > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
