Re: Journaling File System

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:56:22AM +0100, JB wrote:
> On 3/3/06, ssevengor@xxxxxxxxxx <ssevengor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Don't hesitate Ext3!
> >
> > Here explanation;
> > http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/ext3/
> 
> Now, that is a pretty old whitepaper on ext3. There has been quite
> alot of development on journalling file systems over the year.
> 
> A nice overview is here:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems#Features

That document is a bit outdated and it's flat out wrong in places.  

Check out http://linuxgazette.net/122/piszcz.html for one person's
recent set of benchmark runs.  You'll see that he finds ext3 to be
comparable to other file systems and in some tests, ext3 kicks some
serious reiser butt.

-- 
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux