Re: dual core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you all for you answers..and again I apologize because a quick
google got me the same response.

Wayner 

>>> alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 11/18/05 9:59 am >>>
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Wayne Pinette wrote:

> Ok, before I ask this question, I want to apologise for it first for
> many reasons which I won't list here, so here it goes.
> 
> Does anyone know if FC 4 or 5 and or RHEL 4 or 5 is planning to be
dual
> core aware?  I ask because it seems
> intel and consequently all the computer manufacturers
(ibm/dell/seanix)
> are basically forcing dual core technology
> on us even though 90 percent of the hyper threaded cpu power out
there
> isn't being used anyways.  
> 
> Once again, I apologise for the question, and I will probably google
> this right after I send it, but the whole
> subject matter bugs me :-|

It has for a long time. (A couple of years anyways.) Just use the SMP 
kernel. If you have concerns, use a current smp kernel.

Dual (and more) cores have been around for a while.  (Remember the
Alpha?) 
They are just becoming the "next big thing" in x86-land.

-- 
"Invoking the supernatural can explain anything, and hence explains
nothing." 
                  - University of Utah bioengineering professor Gregory
Clark

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux