RE: Problems to Install Oracle Client 10g over Red Hat AS 3.0update3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Fabio,

[ please just call me Nick ;) ]

for the glibc and glibc-devel packages I ran up2date from the command line, this installed the 32 bit packages as the 64 bit packages were already installed when I installed the OS.

I also installed all the compat-* libs from the installation CD's.

I must stress that we are using RHAS4 and having just checked one of our servers I see that we did not have to install 2 versions of libstdc++, we just have the 64 bit version of libstdc++ installed.

Here is a list of the relevant RPM's I have installed -

compat-db-4.1.25-9
compat-gcc-32-3.2.3-47.3
compat-gcc-32-c++-3.2.3-47.3
compat-glibc-2.3.2-95.30
compat-glibc-headers-2.3.2-95.30
compat-libgcc-296-2.96-132.7.2
compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.7.2
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3
glibc-2.3.4-2.13
glibc-2.3.4-2.13
glibc-common-2.3.4-2.13
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.13
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.13
glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.13
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.87
libstdc++-3.4.3-9.EL4
libstdc++-devel-3.4.3-9.EL4

Good Luck,
Nick .


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fábio Augusto [mailto:fabiomirmar@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 16 November 2005 14:26
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Subject: Re: Problems to Install Oracle Client 10g over Red Hat AS
> 3.0update3
> 
> 
> Hi Mr. Lunt,
> 
> I don't like to use the --nodeps too, that's the last choice to the
> administrator. I didn't try to install it using neither the Uvh or
> up2date.
> 
> I would like to know how do you install both these packadges on your
> Opteron Servers. I believe that you have two packadges, one for 32 and
> the other for 64 bits architecture. If you have to install both, how
> do you use to do it?
> 
> Thanks again!!
> 
> 2005/11/16, Lunt, Nick <Nick.Lunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > All my 64 bit machines with Oracle on are AMD, Im afraid I 
> have no experience of POWER 5 servers.
> >
> > Personally I would not use the nodeps arg to RPM on a 
> production machine.
> >
> > I take it that you have tried to install the RPM's with rpm 
> -Uvh instead of -ivh too ?
> > Also I would suggest trying to install the required 
> packages using up2date.
> >
> > I don't know if either of those methods will work. We had a 
> situation here a couple of weeks ago
> > where one of our junior admins made a mess of RPM on a 
> server by using nodeps etc with important library packages,
> > and they ended up having to reinstall !
> >
> > Good Luck,
> > Nick .
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Fábio Augusto [mailto:fabiomirmar@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 16 November 2005 13:08
> > > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> > > Subject: Re: Problems to Install Oracle Client 10g over Red Hat AS
> > > 3.0update3
> > >
> > >
> > > Mr. Lunt,
> > >
> > > First of all, thanks a lot by answering my message.
> > >
> > > Some libraries were already installed using both the 32 and 64 bit
> > > packages. If I use the command rpm -ql package, I'm going 
> to see some
> > > libraries under the /lib directory and the same library under the
> > > /lib64.
> > >
> > > The processor used by the Open Power Server is under the IBM POWER
> > > architecture. If I'm not wrong, this is a POWER 5 processor.
> > >
> > > The great question is: Not all the libraries were 
> installed, and now I
> > > have to do it, so in the installation media, I have some packadges
> > > called packagename-version.ppc.rpm and other packadges called
> > > packagename-version.ppc64.rpm, but If I install one of 
> them and then
> > > try to install the other, I receive the message filed to install,
> > > packadge packagename-version.ppc64.rpm conflicts with
> > > packagename-version.ppc.rpm already installed.
> > >
> > > What should I do? Which is the best way to install those 
> packadges? Is
> > > it safe to use rpm -ivh packagename-version.ppc64.rpm --nodeps?
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot once more.
> > >
> > > 2005/11/16, Lunt, Nick <Nick.Lunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > You can install both the 64 and 32 bit versions of glibc,
> > > libstdc++ etc.
> > > >
> > > > [root@bounty user_scripts]# rpm -q glibc glibc-devel
> > > > glibc-2.3.4-2.13
> > > > glibc-2.3.4-2.13
> > > > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.13
> > > > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.13
> > > >
> > > > I can then query which is which by running rpm -qil glibc
> > > which will give me the info for both the 32 and 64 bit versions.
> > > >
> > > > If you having trouble installed the 32 and 64 bit versions
> > > then there may be some other errors that are causing this.
> > > >
> > > > Good luck,
> > > > Nick .
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > On Behalf Of Fábio Augusto
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 5:21 AM
> > > > > To: Lista Red Hat
> > > > > Subject: Problems to Install Oracle Client 10g over Red Hat
> > > > > AS 3.0 update 3
> > > > >
> > > > > Good Evening for everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > >         I'm working on the installation of a Red Hat AS
> > > 3.0 update 3
> > > > > Linux for a client. The Orable DBA sent me an e-mail
> > > asking about the
> > > > > installation of some pre-requisite packages for linux.
> > > > >
> > > > >         I've installed all the required pre-requisite
> > > packages over
> > > > > linux, but I read something strange on the Documentation
> > > for Oracle
> > > > > Client installation. This documentation asks for the following
> > > > > packages to be installed using both 64 and 32 bits RPMs:
> > > > >
> > > > > libgcc-3.2.3-42
> > > > > libstdc++-3.2.3-42
> > > > > libstdc++-devel-3.2.3-42
> > > > > glibc-2.3.2-95.27
> > > > > glibc-devel-2*
> > > > >
> > > > >         I'm using a Open Power (pSeries - 64 bits) 
> Server. If I
> > > > > install the 64 bit package of any of those and then try
> > > to install the
> > > > > 32 bits package, I'm going to receive and error message
> > > telling that
> > > > > the installation conflicts with the package already installed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone here have already tryied to install two 
> versions of
> > > > > package on the same machine? How can I install 
> without having the
> > > > > conflict? Does anyone have successfully installed an
> > > Oracle Client 10g
> > > > > over a Red Hat AS 3 update 3? Which is the best way to do this
> > > > > installation?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks a Lot!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > --
> > > > > Fábio Augusto Miranda Martins
> > > > > Fone: 6202-3897 / 6987-0590
> > > > > Cel: 9638-9085
> > > > > E-mail: fabiomirmar@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > > > unsubscribe
> > > mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > > > unsubscribe
> > > mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Wesleyan Administration Services Ltd registered number
> > > 5188850 and Wesleyan Unit Trust Managers Ltd registered
> > > number 2114859 ("WUTM Ltd")
> > > > are wholly owned subsidiary companies of Wesleyan Assurance
> > > Society, whose registered number is ZC145.
> > > > WUTM Ltd is a member of IMA. For ISA/PEP/Unit Trusts
> > > Administration Centre: PO Box Basildon SS15 5WQ Telephone:
> > > 0870 601 6129
> > > > Wesleyan Assurance Society and WUTM Ltd are authorised and
> > > regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
> > > > Head Office, Colmore Circus, Birmingham B4 6AR. Telephone:
> > > 0121 200 3003 Fax 0121 200 2971.
> > > > Website: www.wesleyan.co.uk Telephone calls may be recorded
> > > for monitoring and training purposes.
> > > >
> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > >
> > > > This communication and the information it contains is
> > > intended for the person or organisation to whom it is
> > > addressed. Its contents are confidential and may be protected
> > > in law. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it
> > > may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient,
> > > please contact us immediately.
> > > >
> > > > The contents of any attachments in this e-mail may contain
> > > software viruses, which could damage your own computer
> > > system. While every reasonable precaution to minimise this
> > > risk has been taken, we cannot accept liability for any
> > > damage that you sustain as a result of software viruses. You
> > > should carry out your own virus checking procedure before
> > > opening any attachment.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > > unsubscribe
> > > mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Fábio Augusto Miranda Martins
> > > Fone: 6202-3897 / 6987-0590
> > > Cel: 9638-9085
> > > E-mail: fabiomirmar@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > --
> > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > unsubscribe 
> mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > >
> >
> > --
> > redhat-list mailing list
> > unsubscribe 
> mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Fábio Augusto Miranda Martins
> Fone: 6202-3897 / 6987-0590
> Cel: 9638-9085
> E-mail: fabiomirmar@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux