RE: Errata and update releases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I would stick with getting the errata packages 'on or near' the update
release.

The update releases also go through a brief beta cycle where the errata
list included
would be frozen once the beta was announced/released. 

Marco
RHCE

> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Clark, Patricia
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:19 AM
> To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Errata and update releases
> 
> What is the rule-of-thumb pertaining to applied errata in an update
> release?  I need to maintain supported systems via sneakernet.  I have
> the latest updated ISOs for RHEL3 and RHEL4 and want to make 
> sure that I
> have all of the errata packages, too.  Can I correctly assume that
> anything released since the update is all that I need, or do I need to
> additionally obtain errata packages released on or near the update
> release?  I know I can check these current updates against the errata,
> but I want to know for future reference.
> 
> Patti Clark
> Unix System Administrator
> Office of Scientific and Technical Information
> <mailto:clarkp@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux