Mike Klinke wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 13:36, Bill Tangren wrote:
Has anyone else seen problems like this, and know how to fix this
problem?
Bill,
Since I also run sshd through xinetd and happened to have a SMP RH9
box handy, I installed the kernel you are having a problem with.
Unfortunately I couldn't duplicate your symptoms. Xinetd rejected
properly addresses not in the "only_from" statement. The only
differences I can see are:
I don't use the "-u0" server arg
I am using /32 and /24 addresses;(e.g.: 192.168.1.1, 192.168.2.0 )
I only have two addresses specified in the "only_from" statement.
Regards, Mike Klinke
I'll try the other list. In the mean time, I'm going to have to go back
to the previous kernel. I have been using /8 and /16 addressing for
quite some time with no problems. I use the exact same procedure to
secure a RHEL ES4 box, and it has no problems like this.
Thanks for the help.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
