On Aug 1, 2005, at 11:12 AM, Marco A. Ramos wrote:
Talking about this topic, now and since 4 year ago we are using the
firewall
(IPF) in a OpenBSD servers to protect the net from Internet and
Iptables to
protect the inside servers, according with the information in that
days
You're 3 years out of support. You should be using 3.6 (or newer)
with PF. IPF is a piece of shit (excuse my french).
OpenBSD looks more secure than Linux
By default, yes. Nevertheless, it's apples and oranges. Either one
can be made *more* secure by a competent sysadmin.
“Only one remote hole in the default install, in more than 8 years!”
Publicity on www.openbsd.com
But Linux it much powerfully then OpenBSD.
Care to elaborate?
My point it’s to put on the table a discussion about the advantages
between
Iptables on Linux and IPF on OpenBSD.
Don't even think about using IPF in this discussion. Feel free to
compare Linux netfilter/iptables and OpenBSD/PF.
--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
