Rik Herrin wrote: > Ugo, > I know that one of the RHEL clones might be better > in this situation. But I am asking because when I > come to propose RHEL to clients, they sometimes ask > what their situation would be legally if after a year > or two, they wanted to keep their systems running but > without paying support. Would they be forced to shut > down these systems (I think this is the case with > Windows Server which is probably why they are asking > since they don't want to be in the same trap)? Or > could they continue running them and just not get > updates from RHN? Thanks for your input. According to what I've seen, it is a matter of minutes to make a RHEL server become a clone. (This statement is based on the procedure to make a clone another clone (ie Tao to CentOS). Ugo > > >>Rik Herrin wrote: >> >>>Thanks a lot for your reply Ian. But it there any >>>documentation or anything documenting that you can > > do > >>>so? Also, in reference to the question of > > downloading > >>>the ISOs for free (30 day trial) and then > > continuing > >>>to use them after the 30 day trial period without >>>paying, is this legal? Thanks for your time. >> >>Aren't you better off using a clone like CentOS then > > and give a few > >>bucks here and there? > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
