-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I am not a lawyer and I was curious about a possible conflict with RH licensing...and since I have no intention of running afoul of RH licensing I thought I'd appeal to the list for some insight. I have a product that pushes packages out to clients on a network...the product runs on a RHEL3 machine. One of the packages it can potentially push out is "sudo". So I wanted to put the sudo rpm in a directory so that the software could push it to RHEL3 clients when the sysadmin requested it. However I was thinking that this might be considered redistribution of RH package. If that is the case that is fine it will then be up to the sysadmin to deal with getting it for the clients. However if this does fall within the scope of RH licensing then I would prefer to have the package already sitting there and take that responsibility away from the sysadmin. Any thoughts? - -- nathan nathan_at_lagerbottom_dot_com Linux: the choice of a GNU generation! - ------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCpv2+AHGknoE/3V8RAg/uAJkBc/C9oEShorb0TguicAhaMtfs4wCeJJ9H IVxxQiMBiI+9irRQCBd69j4= =fVL3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
