On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 14:52, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:57:48AM -0700, Blair Lowe wrote: > > Thanks for giving me the opportunity to get this off my chest. If you > > have some good suggestions on how we can easily migrate to a working > > server version of Fedora, and still add our own packages (like qmail) to > > create a high availability in-house distribution, I would honestly love > > to hear it, however in spite of being a huge Red Hat fan, my confidence > > in Red Hat as a server based distribution is at an all time low. > > Fedora - any version of it - is not designed to be a high availability > solution. Period. This is a FAQ and clearly documented in the project > objectives. I won't go so far as to say you can't make it work, but it > will by luck or your hard effort, not because Fedora was designed for > stability. If you really want high availability, start with one of the > enterprise releases. If you want to go without support (which you're > obviously prepared to do with 7.3, 9, and Fedora), then consider one of > the RHEL rebuilds (Centos, White Box Linux, Tao, etc.). > > -- > Ed Wilts, RHCE > Mounds View, MN, USA > mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx > Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program OK, I'm in. Now can I set a network interface up without X with any network mask with any of these products (hopefully the latest one)? How about two or more network interfaces? It is just that the curses version of redhat-config-network is poorly developed. What about configuring our own rpm's into a grey distro - can we do that easily, and add our own packages (such as qmail, apache-mod_ssl etc.)? Is kickstart still used, or is that now something else. How easy is it to set up ONE bootable dvd with the distro on it? Can I put the distro on more than one box, or are their user licences? Many questions, so much work ahead. Blair. -- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
