Re: redhat-list Digest, Vol 11, Issue 13Mounting error on boot - RPC Remote System Error No Route to host

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew,

The problem you mentioned "Mounting RPC Remote System
Error - No Route to host" appears to be that the
network driver modules reset the ethernet cards during
the "network" phase of bootup and the network doesn't
fully
function until some time afterward.  The time from
"service network start" (module loading) until full
operation may be longer due to these machines having 3
ethernet interfaces.

Have you put NFS filesystems in /etc/fstab file? 

Please refer the Red Hat bugzilla link
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=107999
where they have provided 
patch to /etc/init.d/netfs (initscripts) that waits
for NFS servers to be available.

Caution: Make sure to take a backup of the script
before modifying it.

As mentioned in the bugzilla, the fix is to add a
piece to the top of /etc/init.d/netfs that tries to
ping its NFS servers for a while before mounting. 
It's written such that
successful pinging will go past that step in a second
or two and unsuccessful
pinging will wait up to 5 minutes before proceeding. 
The long wait is
acceptable in our case, since the servers can't
accomplish their intended tasks
without access to the NFS server.

On the client, type rpcinfo -p  server where server 
is the DNS name or IP address of your server.

Red Hat do not support Red Hat 9 version. The latest
Red Hat Linux version available is Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 3. This is FYI.

Please reply on this mailing list.

Regards,

Satish.

--- redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to
> 	redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	redhat-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: mail delivery on LAN  -  with Linux (Ben
> Russo)
>    2. Re: sgi_fam on RHEL 3? (Ben Russo)
>    3. RE: Compiling kernel rpm (Blair Lowe)
>    4. 7.3, 9, then Fedora? (was Compiling kernel
> rpm) (Blair Lowe)
>    5. RE: Compiling kernel rpm (Otto Haliburton)
>    6. Re: Big Filesystem and Compressed Filesystem?
> (Ben Russo)
>    7. Re: Kickstart & multiple ethernet cards (Harry
> Hoffman)
>    8. Re: Big Filesystem and Compressed Filesystem?
> (Ed Wilts)
>    9. Re: 7.3, 9, then Fedora? (was Compiling kernel
> rpm) (Ed Wilts)
>   10. ACLs and Samba 3 (James D. Parra)
>   11. Re: sgi_fam on RHEL 3? (Dan Stromberg)
>   12. Re: cvs php integration (mbneto)
>   13. Re: yppasswd length limit (Ian Mortimer)
>   14. apt-get to install w3c-libwww-apps-5.4.0-7
> (Mulley, Nikhil)
>   15. RE: yppasswd length limit (Mulley, Nikhil)
>   16. Re: apt-get to install w3c-libwww-apps-5.4.0-7
> (Michael Schwendt)
>   17. Hardware sensors problem with RHEL3 on IBM
> eServer 335
>       (Armen Babikyan)
>   18. How to share files. (Hong Feng)
>   19. futex take much CPU time and cause errors
>       (=?gb2312?B?bHVuYXJkYW5jZXI=?=)
>   20. Re: How to share files. (security)
>   21. Re: .pop (Mollatt Ntini)
>   22. Mounting error on boot - RPC Remote System
> Error - No Route
>       to host (Andrew.Bridgeman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
>   23. Re: yppasswd length limit (zhicheng wang)
>   24. mount options don't work (Medora Schauer)
>   25. [Q] iostat output question ??? (mcclnx mcc)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:20:03 -0500
> From: Ben Russo <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: mail delivery on LAN  -  with Linux
> To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <cs3m89$u69$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> Shiraz Baig wrote:
> > Sir,
> >   This is in continuation of previous discussion
> on
> > the subject.
> >   As mentioned earlier, I am trying to configure
> mail
> > on Linux LAN.  I shall use the names of two
> machines
> > "dtlaptop" and "unix11". The domain name is
> > "awt.com.pk".
> > First I installed sendmail on two machines,
> "dtlaptop"
> > and "unix11". 
> > 
> > I tried to send the mail from one to the other. It
> did
> > not go anywhere. It kept sitting on the sender's
> > machine. Giving a message after expiry time that
> mail
> > could not be delivered because of "relaying
> denied". I
> > tried a method of enclosing the address in square
> > brackets. But it still did not work.
> 
> 
> On both systems
> 
> edit the file /etc/mail/sendmail.cf
> find the lines:
> 
> dnl This changes sendmail to only listen on the
> loopback device 127.0.0.1
> dnl and not on any other network devices. Comment
> this out if you want
> dnl to accept email over the network.
> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')
> 
> 
> Add the characters "dnl" to the BEGINNING of the
> line about
> DAEMON_OPTIONS
> 
> Then run "m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc >
> /etc/sendmail.cf"
> and then run "service sendmail restart"
> 
> Then try your test again.
> 
> -Ben.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:13:42 -0500
> From: Ben Russo <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: sgi_fam on RHEL 3?
> To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <cs3lsb$t05$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> Dan Stromberg wrote:
> > What does RHEL 3 use sgi_fam for, if anything?
> 
> Read "man fam"
> 
> > I have a bunch of RHEL 3 machines that have
> sgi_fam configured off of
> > xinetd, and sgi_fam is getting registered as an
> rpc service, however,
> > sgi_fam is dying prematurely and not servicing any
> actual requests,
> > including a simple "rpcinfo -t localhost sgi_fam".
> 
> You are seeing errors?  Where are these errors
> showing up?
> Can you copy and paste them here?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:57:08 -0700
> From: Blair Lowe <redhat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: Compiling kernel rpm
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <1105552628.5156.141.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 18:46, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:redhat-list-
> > > bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Blair Lowe
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 2:49 PM
> > > To: Red Hat General List
> > > Subject: Compiling kernel rpm
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > When I try to compile an rpm (rpmbuild -ba) for
> kernel-2.4.20-28.7 for
> > > rh7.3, the rpm doesn't create the smp.
> > > 
> > > Here is the patch that I want to apply to
> upgrade the 3ware drivers
> > > (from code off of the 3ware website) in case
> someone at redhat wants to
> > > upgrade the valhalla kernel with this stuff:
> > > 
> > > SPEC FILE (watch for my revision suffix there):
> > >
>
http://www.computerengineering.ca/download/specs/kernel-2.4.spec
> > > 
> > > 3ware PATCH (note patch level in spec file
> above):
> > >
>
http://www.computerengineering.ca/download/patches/3ware-7.7.1-driver-
> > > update.patch
> > > 
> > > Please advise as to how to create the smp
> kernel. Do I need smp arch on
> 
=== message truncated ===



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page ? Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com 

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux