RE: Most Stable Red Hat version for a web and database server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sure Mr. Dixon, you should.

 
Asim 


-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jason Dixon
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 7:25 PM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: Re: Most Stable Red Hat version for a web and database server

On Nov 16, 2004, at 9:21 AM, Mark Farmer wrote:

> Asim Ansari wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply Mr. Farmer, why you suggested Fedora? Do you 
>> have any
>> statistics of having Fedora a plus point over Red Hat Linux 7.3 or 
>> 9.0 as a
>> web/db server.
>
> I'm afraid I don't have any stats.
> FC3 is the newest release and will give you the latest releases of 
> apache & sql servers.
> Failing that I would go with RH9 (All my servers run RHEL3 or FC2 to 
> date) as you can still get updates from: http://fedoralegacy.org/

Wow, your answers are so informative and scientific.  Can I quote you 
on that?

</sarcasm>

--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux